Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31711 - 31720 of 59731 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 31711 - 31720 of 59731 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Roger H. Leiskau
woman and Sara before the mirror were relevant to the State's claim that when Leiskau touched Sara's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8522 - 2017-09-19
woman and Sara before the mirror were relevant to the State's claim that when Leiskau touched Sara's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8522 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
testimony, in which Correa testified that he recognized James’s “face and voice.” He claims that because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108906 - 2014-03-10
testimony, in which Correa testified that he recognized James’s “face and voice.” He claims that because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108906 - 2014-03-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and awarded the Town $6,603 in attorney’s fees and costs. The Stilsons argue the Town’s small claims action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166067 - 2017-09-21
and awarded the Town $6,603 in attorney’s fees and costs. The Stilsons argue the Town’s small claims action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166067 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for summary judgment. However, Kroeger argues he is entitled to a trial on his defamation claim either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169802 - 2017-09-21
for summary judgment. However, Kroeger argues he is entitled to a trial on his defamation claim either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169802 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
claim for relief. Brown was not “resentenced.” The trial court has the authority to modify the terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48431 - 2010-03-29
claim for relief. Brown was not “resentenced.” The trial court has the authority to modify the terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48431 - 2010-03-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the trial court erred when it granted summary judgment dismissing Steffen’s claims because genuine issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31288 - 2014-09-15
that the trial court erred when it granted summary judgment dismissing Steffen’s claims because genuine issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31288 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 24, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appea...
on Wis. Stat. § 808.08(3), and also claiming his constitutional right to a speedy sentencing was violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29183 - 2007-05-24
on Wis. Stat. § 808.08(3), and also claiming his constitutional right to a speedy sentencing was violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29183 - 2007-05-24
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 8, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
whether the court erroneously denied Ty’s ineffectiveness of trial counsel claims. We affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28051 - 2007-02-07
whether the court erroneously denied Ty’s ineffectiveness of trial counsel claims. We affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28051 - 2007-02-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
on WIS. STAT. § 808.08(3), and also claiming his constitutional right to a speedy sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29183 - 2014-09-15
on WIS. STAT. § 808.08(3), and also claiming his constitutional right to a speedy sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29183 - 2014-09-15
State v. Glenn E. Davis
Davis claims that Briand and the other cases the State relies upon are legally distinguishable because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3197 - 2005-03-31
Davis claims that Briand and the other cases the State relies upon are legally distinguishable because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3197 - 2005-03-31