Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31721 - 31730 of 69450 for as he.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. § 974.06. In them, he complained that his trial counsel was ineffective for (1) failing to show
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186053 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
and burglary while armed with a dangerous weapon, both as a repeat offender. He also appeals from an order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142690 - 2015-06-02

[PDF] CA Blank Order
right to file a response, but he has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294343 - 2020-10-07

[PDF] Lynnette M. Branshaw v. Larry L. Stormer
on a dark, stormy night. He testified that he looked down at his speedometer, and when he looked up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20741 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
sexual assault as a habitual criminal, and other convictions where he committed acts of sexual violence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31481 - 2008-01-14

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, appeals the circuit court’s order denying his motion to modify his sentence. He argues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=803107 - 2024-05-22

CA Blank Order
’ extended supervision, consecutive to another sentence he was serving at the time. The record discloses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112568 - 2014-05-19

[PDF] State v. Scott D. Nash
is whether Nash was prejudiced by counsel’s negligence. We conclude that he was not, and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14652 - 2017-09-21

State v. Scott D. Nash
was prejudiced by counsel’s negligence. We conclude that he was not, and therefore affirm. Nash violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14652 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
, Heckert renews his argument that he is entitled to sentence modification on the basis of a new factor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133147 - 2015-01-20