Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31731 - 31740 of 38502 for t's.
Search results 31731 - 31740 of 38502 for t's.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 25, 2022 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=475936 - 2022-01-25
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 25, 2022 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=475936 - 2022-01-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
§ 55.08(1)(c). Under this standard, “[t]he risk of harm must be substantial. Mere speculation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=946179 - 2025-04-24
§ 55.08(1)(c). Under this standard, “[t]he risk of harm must be substantial. Mere speculation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=946179 - 2025-04-24
COURT OF APPEALS
elements for both the predicate offenses and the enhancers, to the plea questionnaire. See id., ¶48 (“‘[T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93295 - 2013-02-25
elements for both the predicate offenses and the enhancers, to the plea questionnaire. See id., ¶48 (“‘[T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93295 - 2013-02-25
[PDF]
State v. Terrance C. Harris
. State, 86 Wis.2d 213, 220-25, 271 N.W.2d 668, 671-73 (1978). Finally, we note that “[t]he test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13441 - 2017-09-21
. State, 86 Wis.2d 213, 220-25, 271 N.W.2d 668, 671-73 (1978). Finally, we note that “[t]he test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13441 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Town of Burke v. City of Madison
that the basic purpose of § 893.80(1) is: “[T]o provide the governmental subdivision an opportunity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13521 - 2017-09-21
that the basic purpose of § 893.80(1) is: “[T]o provide the governmental subdivision an opportunity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13521 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 16, 2019 Sheila T. Reiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243784 - 2019-07-16
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 16, 2019 Sheila T. Reiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243784 - 2019-07-16
State v. Jeffery L. Watson
. The prosecutor stressed that: [T]he crime for which Mr. Watson is to be sentenced is, of course, a very serious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13804 - 2005-03-31
. The prosecutor stressed that: [T]he crime for which Mr. Watson is to be sentenced is, of course, a very serious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13804 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. See State v. Jorgensen, 2008 WI 60, ¶21, 310 Wis. 2d 138, 754 N.W.2d 77. However, “[t]o qualify
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=825013 - 2024-07-11
. See State v. Jorgensen, 2008 WI 60, ¶21, 310 Wis. 2d 138, 754 N.W.2d 77. However, “[t]o qualify
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=825013 - 2024-07-11
Robert P. Murphy v. MCC, Inc.
. [3] "[T]he date as of which [Murphys'] 20% interest in MCC must be appraised" was the other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13993 - 2005-03-31
. [3] "[T]he date as of which [Murphys'] 20% interest in MCC must be appraised" was the other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13993 - 2005-03-31
Mark Kivley v. The City of Milwaukee
recused himself from the substantive votes. In deciding against the Kivleys, the court asserted, “[t]his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15417 - 2005-03-31
recused himself from the substantive votes. In deciding against the Kivleys, the court asserted, “[t]his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15417 - 2005-03-31