Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31741 - 31750 of 82962 for case codes/1000.
Search results 31741 - 31750 of 82962 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that No. 2014AP1173 2 this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142361 - 2017-09-21
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that No. 2014AP1173 2 this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142361 - 2017-09-21
State v. Peter J. Bartram
entry we are not reviewing the decision of the magistrate. The case law makes it plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15864 - 2005-03-31
entry we are not reviewing the decision of the magistrate. The case law makes it plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15864 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
deciding his post-adjudication motions filed in this paternity case. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=634913 - 2023-03-22
deciding his post-adjudication motions filed in this paternity case. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=634913 - 2023-03-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731624 - 2023-11-22
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731624 - 2023-11-22
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94461 - 2014-09-15
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94461 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. John R. Martin
. Before Vergeront, Roggensack and Deininger, JJ. PER CURIAM. These appeals arise from six cases which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11307 - 2017-09-19
. Before Vergeront, Roggensack and Deininger, JJ. PER CURIAM. These appeals arise from six cases which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11307 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Elaine Veasley
need be addressed). No. 95-0417-CR -3- The issue in this case is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8636 - 2017-09-19
need be addressed). No. 95-0417-CR -3- The issue in this case is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8636 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(“The interpretation and application of case law and statutes to undisputed facts are ordinarily questions of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105359 - 2017-09-21
(“The interpretation and application of case law and statutes to undisputed facts are ordinarily questions of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105359 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Douglas G. Skenandore
accordingly. ¶6 The facts in this case are undisputed; however, as the State points out, the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4410 - 2017-09-19
accordingly. ¶6 The facts in this case are undisputed; however, as the State points out, the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4410 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
in concluding he did not establish a prima facie case that his waiver of the right to counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29179 - 2014-09-15
in concluding he did not establish a prima facie case that his waiver of the right to counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29179 - 2014-09-15