Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31741 - 31750 of 57351 for id.
Search results 31741 - 31750 of 57351 for id.
State v. James Gulley
that the defendant has failed to prove one prong, we need not address the other prong. Id. at 697. To prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3792 - 2005-03-31
that the defendant has failed to prove one prong, we need not address the other prong. Id. at 697. To prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3792 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
(1996)]. If the motion raises such facts, the [trial] court must hold an evidentiary hearing. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31308 - 2007-12-26
(1996)]. If the motion raises such facts, the [trial] court must hold an evidentiary hearing. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31308 - 2007-12-26
State v. Darrell C. Solfest
the asportation element because the property, a vehicle, had not been taken or carried away. See id. at 244, 558
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12201 - 2005-03-31
the asportation element because the property, a vehicle, had not been taken or carried away. See id. at 244, 558
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12201 - 2005-03-31
Mary McKnight v. Teachers Retirement Board of Wisconsin
by “any reasonable view” of the evidence. Id. (citations omitted). Additionally, we will accord great
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2943 - 2005-03-31
by “any reasonable view” of the evidence. Id. (citations omitted). Additionally, we will accord great
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2943 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that there was no doubt whatsoever that a child was an incest victim. Id. (citing State v. Romero, 147 Wis. 2d 264, 277
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55725 - 2010-10-18
that there was no doubt whatsoever that a child was an incest victim. Id. (citing State v. Romero, 147 Wis. 2d 264, 277
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55725 - 2010-10-18
CA Blank Order
that a reasonable judge could reach. Id., ¶30. The plea withdrawal hearing began on April 29, 2011.[1] Counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100154 - 2013-07-29
that a reasonable judge could reach. Id., ¶30. The plea withdrawal hearing began on April 29, 2011.[1] Counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100154 - 2013-07-29
State v. Randy A. Davis
the trial court is in the best position to observe and evaluate whether such relief is appropriate. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5835 - 2005-03-31
the trial court is in the best position to observe and evaluate whether such relief is appropriate. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5835 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
position. Id. “For judicial estoppel to be available, three elements must be satisfied: (1) the later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107953 - 2014-02-17
position. Id. “For judicial estoppel to be available, three elements must be satisfied: (1) the later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107953 - 2014-02-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was “not whether there was a single investigation, but whether there was a single conspiracy.” Id., ¶9. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=848337 - 2024-09-10
was “not whether there was a single investigation, but whether there was a single conspiracy.” Id., ¶9. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=848337 - 2024-09-10
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.’” Id. (citations omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050941 - 2025-12-17
probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.’” Id. (citations omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050941 - 2025-12-17