Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31741 - 31750 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 31741 - 31750 of 58506 for speedy trial.
State v. Robert J. Pallone
] Following an evidentiary hearing at which Recknagel and Riff testified, the trial court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13812 - 2005-03-31
] Following an evidentiary hearing at which Recknagel and Riff testified, the trial court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13812 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by the Honorable Mark F. Nielsen, who presided over the trial and also denied Peralta’s postverdict motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815329 - 2024-07-09
by the Honorable Mark F. Nielsen, who presided over the trial and also denied Peralta’s postverdict motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815329 - 2024-07-09
COURT OF APPEALS
The trial court, as we said at the outset, agreed that Wis. Stat. ch. 655 applies and dismissed the cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35702 - 2009-03-03
The trial court, as we said at the outset, agreed that Wis. Stat. ch. 655 applies and dismissed the cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35702 - 2009-03-03
State v. Pharoah Weaver
a severe laceration to the vaginal area. At trial, Lorena Barrera, a Parkside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8152 - 2005-03-31
a severe laceration to the vaginal area. At trial, Lorena Barrera, a Parkside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8152 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James H. Dumke
O'Brien and scheduled for trial to commence on October 30, 1997. On that scheduled trial date Robert P
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16509 - 2005-03-31
O'Brien and scheduled for trial to commence on October 30, 1997. On that scheduled trial date Robert P
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16509 - 2005-03-31
Joseph P. Krause v. Myre Electric, Inc.
of an attorney fee award is “limited to whether the trial court properly exercised its discretion.” See Chmill v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2118 - 2005-03-31
of an attorney fee award is “limited to whether the trial court properly exercised its discretion.” See Chmill v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2118 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 37
the resulting evacuation. Vanbeek argues that the trial court did not have the authority to require
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35485 - 2014-09-15
the resulting evacuation. Vanbeek argues that the trial court did not have the authority to require
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35485 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Alexander E. Grossmann
to 1 In the trial court, the parties stipulated to the relevant facts. 2 Unlike
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11064 - 2017-09-19
to 1 In the trial court, the parties stipulated to the relevant facts. 2 Unlike
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11064 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Pallone
and Riff testified, the trial court denied the motion. The court held that the search was proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13812 - 2014-09-15
and Riff testified, the trial court denied the motion. The court held that the search was proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13812 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
immunity defense before the approaching trial date. One interpretation is that, when the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132183 - 2014-12-21
immunity defense before the approaching trial date. One interpretation is that, when the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132183 - 2014-12-21