Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31751 - 31760 of 82833 for case search.

Brian L. Read v. Village of Fox Point
. Relying upon established case law, the trial court concluded that the limitation, “for the use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8238 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97319 - 2013-05-21

State v. Cory C. Miller
to that section is lawful. Because that standard was not met in this case, the judgment and order are reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10623 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
affirm the order of the circuit court. No. 2014AP253-CR 2 BACKGROUND ¶2 This case has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140354 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition, and we summarily affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315579 - 2020-12-22

State v. Raymond F. Schordie
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-0071-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11932 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is No. 2017AP2283-CR 2 appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231248 - 2018-12-26

[PDF] CA Blank Order
or more violations, in Milwaukee County Circuit Court case No. 2019CF870. The charge stemmed from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718645 - 2023-10-23

[PDF] Dale Phillippi v. Duane Becker
v. Brown County, 90 Wis. 2d 823, 280 N.W.2d 711 (1979). In that case, the supreme court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16149 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Brian L. Read v. Village of Fox Point
case law, the trial court concluded that the limitation, “for the use and enjoyment of the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8238 - 2017-09-19