Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31761 - 31770 of 58285 for speedy trial.

State v. Gregory J. Crapp
. Gregory J. Crapp appeals from a judgment of conviction resulting from a jury trial in which he was found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9772 - 2005-03-31

State v. Kenneth E. Hanson
intoxication obtained as a result of that stop should be suppressed. The trial court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11151 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the suppression motion. Borrmann requested a jury trial, but the trial date was substantially delayed by his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=689072 - 2023-08-15

[PDF] State v. Bradley W. Sexton
the 1 The trial court approved this search as an inventory search. Because we uphold the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8533 - 2017-09-19

Langlade County Department of Human Services v. Ashleigh P.
A.S. appeals an order terminating his parental rights to his son, Tyler P. James argues the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6006 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Town of Windsor v. Village of DeForest
the remaining 234 acres as well, and DeForest did so. The issues are whether the trial court misapplied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3402 - 2017-09-19

State v. Carolyn L.C.
the meaning of § 51.20(1)(a)2, Stats. Because the trial court’s finding that she was dangerous to herself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15702 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
was convicted in December 2017, after a jury trial, of second-degree sexual assault of an unconscious victim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1041687 - 2025-11-25

[PDF] City of Mequon v. Terry Quigley
1 Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). No. 99-1088-FT 2 to suppress. The trial court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15430 - 2017-09-21

State v. Larry R. Dowe
to deliver is a lesser-included offense of a tax stamp violation. In a nonfinal order, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8589 - 2005-03-31