Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31771 - 31780 of 82833 for case search.

Robert N. Ross v. Tommy Martini
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96‑0138
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10248 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
property damage. Margaret then filed a motion in a separate case to consolidate that case with this one
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91821 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
the jury, “So this case really comes down to you finding that the defendant was hunting; that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42964 - 2009-11-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
) the following day. DISCUSSION ¶4 Disorderly conduct in the context of this case means “violent, abusive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160118 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
). We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case has a substantial procedural history. In 1998, a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105398 - 2013-12-09

[PDF] NOTICE
(1) requires an appellant’s brief to contain a statement of the case, “which must include
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42964 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI App 169
2009 WI App 169 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2008XX702-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44483 - 2014-09-15

Bruce Joseph Croushore v.
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 98-0437-BA Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17363 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
this to me. He’s why [sic] am here sir. Please look at this case Thank you for your time.” (Some
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133146 - 2015-01-20

COURT OF APPEALS
, 693 (“The interpretation and application of case law and statutes to undisputed facts are ordinarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105359 - 2013-12-09