Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31771 - 31780 of 73363 for ha.
Search results 31771 - 31780 of 73363 for ha.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2019AP1180-CRNM State of Wisconsin v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265008 - 2020-06-23
that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2019AP1180-CRNM State of Wisconsin v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265008 - 2020-06-23
State v. Bradley W. Sexton
and rebuttal. She argued, “We were allowed to get in the evidence the fact that he has 16 prior convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4899 - 2005-03-31
and rebuttal. She argued, “We were allowed to get in the evidence the fact that he has 16 prior convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4899 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert J. Smothers
PER CURIAM. Robert J. Smothers has appealed from an order denying a postconviction motion filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3452 - 2005-03-31
PER CURIAM. Robert J. Smothers has appealed from an order denying a postconviction motion filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3452 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Craig V. Kitchen
law and payment of $8060.34 in costs. Neither side has appealed. ¶2 We approve the findings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16724 - 2005-03-31
law and payment of $8060.34 in costs. Neither side has appealed. ¶2 We approve the findings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16724 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Knight, 168 Wis. 2d 509, 520, 484 N.W.2d 540, 544 (1992). ¶8 Walker insists that he has filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128640 - 2014-11-17
. Knight, 168 Wis. 2d 509, 520, 484 N.W.2d 540, 544 (1992). ¶8 Walker insists that he has filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128640 - 2014-11-17
State v. Chet Woodward
? [WOODWARD]: Yes, I understand that. THE COURT: [Defense counsel], do you believe your client has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12378 - 2005-03-31
? [WOODWARD]: Yes, I understand that. THE COURT: [Defense counsel], do you believe your client has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12378 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to plead guilty. ¶12 Thomas has not demonstrated that he was prejudiced by counsel’s advice regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105183 - 2013-12-10
to plead guilty. ¶12 Thomas has not demonstrated that he was prejudiced by counsel’s advice regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105183 - 2013-12-10
COURT OF APPEALS
. Id. Similarly, whether a person has standing to challenge a seizure is a question of law we review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96078 - 2013-04-30
. Id. Similarly, whether a person has standing to challenge a seizure is a question of law we review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96078 - 2013-04-30
COURT OF APPEALS
because he or she believes a traffic violation has been committed in his or her presence. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125618 - 2014-11-03
because he or she believes a traffic violation has been committed in his or her presence. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125618 - 2014-11-03
COURT OF APPEALS
has not established he was prejudiced by any deficient representation. Accordingly, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35470 - 2009-02-09
has not established he was prejudiced by any deficient representation. Accordingly, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35470 - 2009-02-09