Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31771 - 31780 of 66014 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 31771 - 31780 of 66014 for motion to dismiss.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for J.K. ground was dismissed. The matter then proceeded to the disposition phase. Based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051352 - 2025-12-16
for J.K. ground was dismissed. The matter then proceeded to the disposition phase. Based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051352 - 2025-12-16
CA Blank Order
in open court. In exchange for Lombard’s plea, the State agreed to dismiss a charge of strangulation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142819 - 2015-06-02
in open court. In exchange for Lombard’s plea, the State agreed to dismiss a charge of strangulation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142819 - 2015-06-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was dismissed and read in. The circuit court conducted a colloquy with Mason and accepted his plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007198 - 2025-09-09
was dismissed and read in. The circuit court conducted a colloquy with Mason and accepted his plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007198 - 2025-09-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
dismissed because the statute of limitations had expired when the circuit court failed to hold a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=848984 - 2024-09-17
dismissed because the statute of limitations had expired when the circuit court failed to hold a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=848984 - 2024-09-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
a judgment dismissing their claim for adverse possession of a disputed parcel of land, and ordering them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31682 - 2014-09-15
a judgment dismissing their claim for adverse possession of a disputed parcel of land, and ordering them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31682 - 2014-09-15
Timothy Oddsen v. City of Milwaukee
calendar. We affirm the circuit court’s judgment dismissing the Estate’s case because, even assuming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12845 - 2005-03-31
calendar. We affirm the circuit court’s judgment dismissing the Estate’s case because, even assuming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12845 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Bethany P.A.C. v. Charles Ermers
. Bethany C. appeals a summary judgment order dismissing her negligence claim against the Mt. Morris
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13256 - 2017-09-21
. Bethany C. appeals a summary judgment order dismissing her negligence claim against the Mt. Morris
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13256 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
, the State agreed to dismiss and read in the remaining two counts and to cap its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958004 - 2025-05-21
, the State agreed to dismiss and read in the remaining two counts and to cap its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958004 - 2025-05-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
dismissed the PAC charge, as required by WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(c). The court imposed and stayed a three
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871244 - 2024-11-05
dismissed the PAC charge, as required by WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(c). The court imposed and stayed a three
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871244 - 2024-11-05
State v. Justin H.
in and dismissed. The issue at disposition was placement. The State argued that Justin had been placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9427 - 2005-03-31
in and dismissed. The issue at disposition was placement. The State argued that Justin had been placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9427 - 2005-03-31