Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31771 - 31780 of 63199 for records.

COURT OF APPEALS
reflecting August 13, 2007, as the date of issuance and mailing. ¶5 The record reflects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82286 - 2012-05-09

[PDF] State v. Ronald S. Greene
it had struck the statement from the record and instructed the jury to disregard the statement. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13162 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 131 Wis. 2d at 274. To meet its burden, the State may use the entire record and “may examine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119176 - 2014-09-15

State v. William D. Olson
that the trial court would impose "one lump sentence." But the record reflects that Olson entered his guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8358 - 2005-03-31

Bruce L. Ottinger v. Jose Pinel
propensities”—based on his record—there is no evidence that the Guards were aware of Melik’s record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11758 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. § 802.06(2)(a).2 The record reflected that two service attempts were made, both on April 29, 2020
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=596925 - 2022-12-06

David R. Umhoefer v. Police and Fire Commission of the City of Mequon
and Umhoefer were still married, Umhoefer had tape-recorded numerous conversations she had with third parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4737 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 180
, and indicated the prison’s “records have been noted.” Additionally, the notice and request for disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44050 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 23, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
; and (3) they are entitled to twelve percent postjudgment interest. Because the record demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27841 - 2007-01-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
record conclusively demonstrates that the movant is not entitled to relief. State v. Balliette, 2011
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125451 - 2017-09-21