Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31781 - 31790 of 69114 for he.
Search results 31781 - 31790 of 69114 for he.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and remand with instructions that he be permitted to withdraw his no-contest pleas, as Boyd requests
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103811 - 2017-09-21
and remand with instructions that he be permitted to withdraw his no-contest pleas, as Boyd requests
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103811 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Paul A. Balthazor
Ridgway was the only witness to testify at the hearing on Balthazor’s motion to suppress evidence. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6967 - 2017-09-20
Ridgway was the only witness to testify at the hearing on Balthazor’s motion to suppress evidence. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6967 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as a persistent repeater. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion in which he requested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97184 - 2014-09-15
as a persistent repeater. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion in which he requested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97184 - 2014-09-15
State v. Daniel H. Callahan
pounds. ¶4 The owner of the store, Duane Blaney, was the State’s key witness. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19772 - 2005-09-28
pounds. ¶4 The owner of the store, Duane Blaney, was the State’s key witness. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19772 - 2005-09-28
CA Blank Order
to suppress evidence. State patrol trooper Colin Brown testified he observed Roedell’s oncoming vehicle after
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133471 - 2015-01-26
to suppress evidence. State patrol trooper Colin Brown testified he observed Roedell’s oncoming vehicle after
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133471 - 2015-01-26
State v. Daniel W. Corrigan
)(a), Stats. Corrigan contends that he was denied his constitutional right to confront a witness when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8888 - 2005-03-31
)(a), Stats. Corrigan contends that he was denied his constitutional right to confront a witness when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8888 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. William F. Baskin
, and possession of tetrahydrocannabinols, see WIS. STAT. No. 01-1375-CR 2 § 961.41(3g)(e). He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3992 - 2017-09-20
, and possession of tetrahydrocannabinols, see WIS. STAT. No. 01-1375-CR 2 § 961.41(3g)(e). He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3992 - 2017-09-20
State v. Trentt O. Kinison
, at approximately 6:00 p.m., he received a report from dispatch that an orange Mustang car was traveling at a high
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7453 - 2005-03-31
, at approximately 6:00 p.m., he received a report from dispatch that an orange Mustang car was traveling at a high
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7453 - 2005-03-31
Linda S. Painter v. William D. Whitnall
Whitnall appeals from a judgment entered against him in this legal malpractice action. He challenges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3251 - 2005-03-31
Whitnall appeals from a judgment entered against him in this legal malpractice action. He challenges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3251 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
such as Coleman’s understanding of the nature of the charge and the range of punishments he faced
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=860562 - 2024-10-10
such as Coleman’s understanding of the nature of the charge and the range of punishments he faced
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=860562 - 2024-10-10