Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31781 - 31790 of 57351 for id.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the Fourth Amendment are relaxed for probationers. Id. Pertinent here, the probation officer did not need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93766 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
merit as to whether counsel was ineffective in regard to Spates’s current claim of PTSD. See id. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1061667 - 2026-01-14

COURT OF APPEALS
of a statute, which also presents a question of law. Id. ¶7 Wisconsin Stat. § 32.10 is based on Article
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63631 - 2011-06-08

[PDF] James R. Schultz v. Gerald Berge
will and not its judgment; and (4) whether the evidence supports the determination. Id.; State ex rel. Riley v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11567 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
circumstances. See id., 205 Wis. 2d at 681, n.7, 556 N.W.2d at 139 n.7; see also State v. Knight, 168 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128640 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Donna Sue Spielman v. Jeffrey Allen Spielman
discharge resulted in a substantial change of circumstances under § 767.32. Id. at 774-75. We also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3030 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether the circuit court erred as a matter of law is a constitutional fact which we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83712 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
discretion. See id. Our review of the record confirms that the circuit court appropriately considered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616597 - 2023-01-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the record for evidence to support the municipal court’s decision. Id. at 361-62. We uphold the municipal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66366 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Jo A. Kain
that the caller is honest and well informed about the illegal activity. See id. at 331-32. Our supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2778 - 2017-09-19