Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3181 - 3190 of 30070 for de.
Search results 3181 - 3190 of 30070 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Superior attempts to obtain a de novo standard of review by essentially urging this court to conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301526 - 2020-11-03
Superior attempts to obtain a de novo standard of review by essentially urging this court to conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301526 - 2020-11-03
Milwaukee Precision Casting, Inc. v. Mark E. Hagedorn
to MPC’s cross-appeal, we decide the issues de novo and determine that prejudgment interest was unavailable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11245 - 2005-03-31
to MPC’s cross-appeal, we decide the issues de novo and determine that prejudgment interest was unavailable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11245 - 2005-03-31
WI App 79 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP983-CR Complete Title ...
m. van de water and patrick c. haughney, Judges. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83330 - 2012-07-26
m. van de water and patrick c. haughney, Judges. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83330 - 2012-07-26
[PDF]
WI APP 10
. VAN DE WATER and MARIA S. LAZAR, Judges. Order reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182738 - 2017-09-21
. VAN DE WATER and MARIA S. LAZAR, Judges. Order reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182738 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
review is de novo. The state advocates a “clearly erroneous” standard. We need not resolve this dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87554 - 2012-09-26
review is de novo. The state advocates a “clearly erroneous” standard. We need not resolve this dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87554 - 2012-09-26
[PDF]
WI App 70
” the damages awards. I. Statute of Limitations. ¶15 Our review of a decision on summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147047 - 2017-09-21
” the damages awards. I. Statute of Limitations. ¶15 Our review of a decision on summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147047 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
analysis ..., our review is de novo. Id., ¶¶40-43 (citations and quoted sources omitted). ¶9 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173328 - 2017-09-21
analysis ..., our review is de novo. Id., ¶¶40-43 (citations and quoted sources omitted). ¶9 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173328 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
commissioner denied the parties’ motions. John and Lori requested de novo review of the family court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213621 - 2018-05-31
commissioner denied the parties’ motions. John and Lori requested de novo review of the family court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213621 - 2018-05-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment to Maple Valley.5 ¶19 We review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo.6 Munger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955505 - 2025-06-25
judgment to Maple Valley.5 ¶19 We review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo.6 Munger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955505 - 2025-06-25
[PDF]
Steven R. Stein v. State of Wisconsin Psychology Examining Board
pursuant to WIS. STAT. ch. 227 and the circuit court affirmed. The court reviewed de novo the Board’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5761 - 2017-09-19
pursuant to WIS. STAT. ch. 227 and the circuit court affirmed. The court reviewed de novo the Board’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5761 - 2017-09-19