Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3181 - 3190 of 68502 for did.
Search results 3181 - 3190 of 68502 for did.
State v. James J. Meyer
regarding his discussion with Meyer: Q: Did you speak to anybody while you were over there [Meyer’s home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5435 - 2005-03-31
regarding his discussion with Meyer: Q: Did you speak to anybody while you were over there [Meyer’s home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5435 - 2005-03-31
State v. Debbie A. Ramos
conclude that the trial court did not misuse its discretion in either respect, we affirm. In November 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11448 - 2005-03-31
conclude that the trial court did not misuse its discretion in either respect, we affirm. In November 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11448 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Madison v. Robert R. Schultz
Amendment. We conclude the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15158 - 2017-09-21
Amendment. We conclude the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15158 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jerome W.
in foster care on July 11, 2002, when Victoria left her at Jerome’s mother’s home and did not return
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20227 - 2017-09-21
in foster care on July 11, 2002, when Victoria left her at Jerome’s mother’s home and did not return
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20227 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
for failing to impeach a witness with that witness’s statements in a prior trial. Because trial counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26683 - 2014-09-15
for failing to impeach a witness with that witness’s statements in a prior trial. Because trial counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26683 - 2014-09-15
State v. Andre Derrick Wingo
in misdemeanor cases, applied to this case, that statute did not in fact apply. Nor did the defendant agree
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17460 - 2009-02-18
in misdemeanor cases, applied to this case, that statute did not in fact apply. Nor did the defendant agree
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17460 - 2009-02-18
State v. Wesley S. Leonard
the revocation order and that the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion. We therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14961 - 2005-03-31
the revocation order and that the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion. We therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14961 - 2005-03-31
State v. Linda B.-S.
or services. She complains that the State did not prove that Racine County Human Services (RCHS) was diligent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9793 - 2005-03-31
or services. She complains that the State did not prove that Racine County Human Services (RCHS) was diligent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9793 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
court violated WIS. STAT. § 974.06(3)(b) when it did not refer him to the public defender’s office
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28502 - 2014-09-15
court violated WIS. STAT. § 974.06(3)(b) when it did not refer him to the public defender’s office
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28502 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Nancy Morales v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
court did not err by denying Liberty’s motion to set aside the liability portion of the default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3859 - 2017-09-20
court did not err by denying Liberty’s motion to set aside the liability portion of the default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3859 - 2017-09-20