Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3181 - 3190 of 6143 for li.
Search results 3181 - 3190 of 6143 for li.
James S. Cook v. David H. Schwarz
no explanation for her detailed knowledge of his apartment. Cook argues that Q.S. lied because she claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13176 - 2005-03-31
no explanation for her detailed knowledge of his apartment. Cook argues that Q.S. lied because she claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13176 - 2005-03-31
Hubert Hill v. Paul Zimmerman
The ultimate decision whether to grant mandamus lies within the trial court's discretion. George v. Record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7964 - 2005-03-31
The ultimate decision whether to grant mandamus lies within the trial court's discretion. George v. Record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7964 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI APP 177
, it is not the sentencing court’s function to classify an inmate to a particular institution or program; this authority lies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43013 - 2009-12-15
, it is not the sentencing court’s function to classify an inmate to a particular institution or program; this authority lies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43013 - 2009-12-15
COURT OF APPEALS
telephonically. “The decision whether to allow telephonic testimony lies within the sound discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86711 - 2012-09-04
telephonically. “The decision whether to allow telephonic testimony lies within the sound discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86711 - 2012-09-04
State v. Ramon H.
jurisdiction under § 938.18, lies within the sound discretion of the juvenile court. See J.A.L. v. State, 162
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2532 - 2005-03-31
jurisdiction under § 938.18, lies within the sound discretion of the juvenile court. See J.A.L. v. State, 162
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2532 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the mistrial motion. ¶18 The decision whether to grant a motion for a mistrial lies within the sound
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109234 - 2014-03-19
the mistrial motion. ¶18 The decision whether to grant a motion for a mistrial lies within the sound
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109234 - 2014-03-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. Virginia, 527 U.S. 116, 138 (1999). ¶10 Therein lies the first problem with Lee’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33356 - 2008-07-15
. Virginia, 527 U.S. 116, 138 (1999). ¶10 Therein lies the first problem with Lee’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33356 - 2008-07-15
[PDF]
James S. Cook v. David H. Schwarz
, he provided no explanation for her detailed knowledge of his apartment. Cook argues that Q.S. lied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13174 - 2017-09-21
, he provided no explanation for her detailed knowledge of his apartment. Cook argues that Q.S. lied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13174 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2013AP925-CR 9 ¶21 At trial, Boruch admitted he had tried to stage the accident scene and lied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107109 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2013AP925-CR 9 ¶21 At trial, Boruch admitted he had tried to stage the accident scene and lied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107109 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“the alleged negligence lies in failing to do something,” as opposed to “negligently choosing between courses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239073 - 2019-04-16
“the alleged negligence lies in failing to do something,” as opposed to “negligently choosing between courses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239073 - 2019-04-16