Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3181 - 3190 of 6667 for mix.

State v. Johnny L. Hampton
relative to the constitutional claim is mixed. We will not overturn a trial court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12124 - 2005-03-31

State v. Thomas D. Gogin
in the outcome.” Id. at 694. ¶6 An ineffective assistance claim presents a mixed question of law and fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2857 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a postconviction motion alleges sufficient facts to warrant an evidentiary hearing is a mixed standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69079 - 2014-09-15

State v. Paul F. Wischer
counsel’s actions constitute ineffective assistance is a mixed question of law and fact. Id. at ¶21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6657 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶11 We review the denial of an ineffective assistance claim as a mixed question of fact and law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106317 - 2017-09-21

State v. Daniel Aguilar
WI App 2, ¶49, 232 Wis. 2d 62, 606 N.W.2d 207 (1999). Whether counsel was ineffective is a mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15190 - 2005-03-31

State v. Henry L. Williams
mixes the requirements for a constitutionally valid plea with the requirements for proof of repeater
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3155 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Cleophus Amerson
.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687. Both the performance and the prejudice components are mixed questions of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9791 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s actions constitute ineffective assistance is a mixed question of law and fact. Id., ¶21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88864 - 2012-10-31

Comstock Dairy Enterprises, Inc. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Company
not warrant sanctions. ¶16 Whether a claim is frivolous is a mixed question of law and fact. Kangas v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7101 - 2005-03-31