Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3181 - 3190 of 63187 for records.
Search results 3181 - 3190 of 63187 for records.
State v. Kenneth L. Champion
; the failure to identify and discover certain of Champion’s psychiatric records relevant to sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3488 - 2005-03-31
; the failure to identify and discover certain of Champion’s psychiatric records relevant to sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3488 - 2005-03-31
State v. Van L. Schwartz
a guilty plea because the record does not establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12070 - 2005-03-31
a guilty plea because the record does not establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12070 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207297 - 2018-01-18
not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207297 - 2018-01-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2014AP2596-CRNM 2 independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145008 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2014AP2596-CRNM 2 independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145008 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
that Black’s claims in his postconviction motion are unsupported by the record. We therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32721 - 2014-09-15
that Black’s claims in his postconviction motion are unsupported by the record. We therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32721 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170560 - 2017-09-21
responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170560 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
City of New Berlin v. Thomas W. Koeppen
responded that he would like to tape record the dialogue surrounding the tests. The officer agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8398 - 2017-09-19
responded that he would like to tape record the dialogue surrounding the tests. The officer agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8398 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders, counsel’s report, and Jackson’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1036148 - 2025-11-11
review of the record as mandated by Anders, counsel’s report, and Jackson’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1036148 - 2025-11-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142819 - 2017-09-21
not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142819 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101903 - 2013-09-17
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101903 - 2013-09-17