Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3181 - 3190 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 3181 - 3190 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Michael Hirn
) and 939.05, STATS. Hirn presents four arguments on appeal: (1) the trial court erroneously permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13342 - 2017-09-21
) and 939.05, STATS. Hirn presents four arguments on appeal: (1) the trial court erroneously permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13342 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial because a juror downloaded a guide for jury deliberations from the internet and shared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260758 - 2020-05-19
trial because a juror downloaded a guide for jury deliberations from the internet and shared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260758 - 2020-05-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of postconviction and trial counsel based on trial counsel’s failure to (1) object to the submission of a lesser
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90616 - 2012-12-18
of postconviction and trial counsel based on trial counsel’s failure to (1) object to the submission of a lesser
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90616 - 2012-12-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of postconviction and trial counsel based on trial counsel’s failure to (1) object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90616 - 2014-09-15
assistance of postconviction and trial counsel based on trial counsel’s failure to (1) object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90616 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. Nommensen seeks a new trial in the interest of justice because he claims that unfair evidentiary rulings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67746 - 2011-07-12
. Nommensen seeks a new trial in the interest of justice because he claims that unfair evidentiary rulings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67746 - 2011-07-12
State v. Michael Hirn
) and 939.05, Stats. Hirn presents four arguments on appeal: (1) the trial court erroneously permitted hearsay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13342 - 2005-03-31
) and 939.05, Stats. Hirn presents four arguments on appeal: (1) the trial court erroneously permitted hearsay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13342 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
are whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion in failing to: (1) consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41524 - 2014-09-15
are whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion in failing to: (1) consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41524 - 2014-09-15
State v. Richard F. Pfeiffer
homicide and from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15532 - 2005-03-31
homicide and from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15532 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. The issues are whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion in failing to: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41524 - 2009-09-28
. The issues are whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion in failing to: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41524 - 2009-09-28
[PDF]
WI APP 33
of the assigned judge in the case before any substantive issue was resolved and, therefore, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259962 - 2020-07-09
of the assigned judge in the case before any substantive issue was resolved and, therefore, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259962 - 2020-07-09