Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31801 - 31810 of 48701 for WA 0852 2611 9277 [[GLORION]] Biaya Kitchen Set Mewah Premium Green Sedayu Jakarta Barat.

State v. Bobbie L. Wilson
. Specifically, we have held: [T]he phrase “new factor” refers to a fact or set of facts highly relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18677 - 2005-06-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
opportunity to file a brief. If the respondent fails to file a brief by the date set forth in this order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=877540 - 2024-11-20

State v. Morris F Clement
assessment meets the substantial probability of reoffense standard set forth in Wis. Stat. § 980.04(4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19476 - 2005-09-06

COURT OF APPEALS
exercised its discretion in denying his motion for resentencing. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107406 - 2014-01-29

State v. Edgar Smith
by the circuit court and set forth in Smith's petition for leave to appeal are: (1) whether the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7944 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
. A new factor is a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the defendant’s sentence that was unknown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34511 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
guidelines in accordance with the framework set forth in State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶¶39-46, 270 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183290 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Kathy Davis v. Jodine Deppisch
not set forth that such statements existed. On the decision form, the committee indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21463 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
court must consider the factors set forth in WIS. STAT. § 48.426, giving paramount consideration
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=384803 - 2021-07-07

C & C Pawnbrokers, LLC v. City of Eau Claire
discrimination will not be set aside if any state of facts reasonably may be conceived to justify it.” Dandridge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7639 - 2005-03-31