Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31801 - 31810 of 64166 for records.
Search results 31801 - 31810 of 64166 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=384339 - 2021-07-07
of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=384339 - 2021-07-07
CA Blank Order
factor. We disagree and affirm. Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133042 - 2015-01-20
factor. We disagree and affirm. Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133042 - 2015-01-20
CA Blank Order
independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107784 - 2014-02-03
independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107784 - 2014-02-03
Fire & Casualty Insurance Company of Connecticut v. Ronald J. Bruendl
in the record. West Bend Co. v. LIRC, 149 Wis.2d 110, 117-18, 438 N.W.2d 823, 827 (1989
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9926 - 2005-03-31
in the record. West Bend Co. v. LIRC, 149 Wis.2d 110, 117-18, 438 N.W.2d 823, 827 (1989
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9926 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
, and 939.50(3)(h) (2011-12).[1] Garcia has not responded. Although our initial review of the record shows
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104491 - 2013-11-13
, and 939.50(3)(h) (2011-12).[1] Garcia has not responded. Although our initial review of the record shows
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104491 - 2013-11-13
State v. Harrison M. Marcum
not challenge this history. Instead, he appears to be arguing that he had no prior convictions on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25003 - 2006-05-02
not challenge this history. Instead, he appears to be arguing that he had no prior convictions on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25003 - 2006-05-02
State v. Wua Xiong
on the victim, and Xiong’s record of committing prior, serious offenses, and his failure to benefit from his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13036 - 2005-03-31
on the victim, and Xiong’s record of committing prior, serious offenses, and his failure to benefit from his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13036 - 2005-03-31
State v. Stephen Greer
), and Rule 809.32(1), Stats., to which Greer responded. After an independent review of the records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11767 - 2005-03-31
), and Rule 809.32(1), Stats., to which Greer responded. After an independent review of the records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11767 - 2005-03-31
State v. Erik J. Moore
and the defendant has the burden to show unreasonableness from the record. Id. The primary factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20243 - 2005-12-21
and the defendant has the burden to show unreasonableness from the record. Id. The primary factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20243 - 2005-12-21
[PDF]
State v. James F. Emerich
the court: Just for the record, [the plea agreement] was made not knowing about the Wood County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2359 - 2017-09-19
the court: Just for the record, [the plea agreement] was made not knowing about the Wood County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2359 - 2017-09-19