Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31811 - 31820 of 64027 for records/1000.
Search results 31811 - 31820 of 64027 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not filed a response. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=624016 - 2023-02-21
not filed a response. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=624016 - 2023-02-21
CA Blank Order
of counsel.[1] Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude that summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102925 - 2013-10-15
of counsel.[1] Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude that summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102925 - 2013-10-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Sheriff Grady Hartman. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699983 - 2023-09-06
Sheriff Grady Hartman. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699983 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230473 - 2018-12-11
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230473 - 2018-12-11
State v. James Kevin Harvey
the orders and the record supports both findings, we affirm the orders. ¶2 Harvey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6355 - 2005-03-31
the orders and the record supports both findings, we affirm the orders. ¶2 Harvey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6355 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Justen L. Carter
the record supports the trial court’s findings that the State did not deliberately slow down the process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26298 - 2017-09-21
the record supports the trial court’s findings that the State did not deliberately slow down the process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26298 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=384910 - 2021-07-08
a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=384910 - 2021-07-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record identified a potential issue regarding one of the four counts of failure to pay support
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=599420 - 2022-12-14
of the record identified a potential issue regarding one of the four counts of failure to pay support
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=599420 - 2022-12-14
State v. Kevin H. Gillson
absolutely nothing in the record discredited Stephanie’s testimony and statements to Bannon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13341 - 2005-03-31
absolutely nothing in the record discredited Stephanie’s testimony and statements to Bannon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13341 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
memoranda and the record, we affirm. The facts are undisputed. At the time she was laid off in February
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109103 - 2014-03-18
memoranda and the record, we affirm. The facts are undisputed. At the time she was laid off in February
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109103 - 2014-03-18