Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31821 - 31830 of 74636 for public records.
Search results 31821 - 31830 of 74636 for public records.
Nicholas C. L. v. Julie R. L.
of witnesses. The record demonstrates that this was extremely contentious litigation, fraught with tragic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25085 - 2006-06-27
of witnesses. The record demonstrates that this was extremely contentious litigation, fraught with tragic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25085 - 2006-06-27
Catherine Houtakker v. Gerald F. Houtakker
on that contract; and the deed was given and recorded in 1986. Lee further asserted that Skemp’s notes showed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13867 - 2005-03-31
on that contract; and the deed was given and recorded in 1986. Lee further asserted that Skemp’s notes showed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13867 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was unduly harsh. Because the record reflects that Chaney knew what “party to a crime” liability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35500 - 2009-02-09
was unduly harsh. Because the record reflects that Chaney knew what “party to a crime” liability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35500 - 2009-02-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
this standard whether the decision applies a correct legal standard to the facts of record. Miller v. Hanover
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126102 - 2017-09-21
this standard whether the decision applies a correct legal standard to the facts of record. Miller v. Hanover
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126102 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
M&I Bank South Central v. Neil C. Lofberg
it is clear from the record that the contents of depositions and testimony from the injunction hearings were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12752 - 2017-09-21
it is clear from the record that the contents of depositions and testimony from the injunction hearings were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12752 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, assistant state public defender. There was an oral argument by Andrew R. Hinkel. For the plaintiff
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=499822 - 2022-05-16
, assistant state public defender. There was an oral argument by Andrew R. Hinkel. For the plaintiff
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=499822 - 2022-05-16
[PDF]
State v. John T. Trochinski, Jr.
public defender. For the plaintiff-respondent the cause was argued by Daniel J. O'Brien
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16421 - 2017-09-21
public defender. For the plaintiff-respondent the cause was argued by Daniel J. O'Brien
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16421 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and is recorded in over 800 pages of transcript. Following the hearing, the DOE attorney argued that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70385 - 2011-08-31
and is recorded in over 800 pages of transcript. Following the hearing, the DOE attorney argued that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70385 - 2011-08-31
State v. John T. Trochinski, Jr.
-petitioner there were briefs and oral argument by James L. Fullin, assistant state public defender
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16421 - 2005-03-31
-petitioner there were briefs and oral argument by James L. Fullin, assistant state public defender
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16421 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court explain its reasoning, when the court does not do so, we may search the record to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974633 - 2025-06-26
court explain its reasoning, when the court does not do so, we may search the record to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974633 - 2025-06-26