Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31831 - 31840 of 51598 for Cost-effective treatments https://simplemedrx.top.

State v. Jeffrey W. Holzemer
motions. On appeal, Holzemer argues that he did not receive effective assistance from his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7994 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
and the prima facie effect of WIS. STAT. § 885.235(1g)(c), and the State must prove the results by expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32451 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey W. Holzemer
that he did not receive effective assistance from his trial counsel and that the trial court misused its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7995 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
and the prima facie effect of Wis. Stat. § 885.235(1g)(c), and the State must prove the results by expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32451 - 2008-04-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
on the effective date of this subsection,” namely, March 2, 2018. 2017 Wis. Act 139, § 16. It is undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=860610 - 2024-10-11

[PDF] WI APP 84
right of refusal shall again take effect. The lease provisions are similar to this purchase provision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118462 - 2014-09-16

[PDF] State v. Edward D. Anderson
effect on his ability to enroll in certain programming while in custody. This had the effect of Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19746 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 3
because it proved only that the board’s authorization was effective on January 17, when the board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131197 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey W. Holzemer
that he did not receive effective assistance from his trial counsel and that the trial court misused its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7994 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Sherrie S. Tucker
that the jury needs protection and take reasonable precautions to minimize any prejudicial effect
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16455 - 2017-09-21