Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31841 - 31850 of 84057 for simple case search.
Search results 31841 - 31850 of 84057 for simple case search.
State v. Tony M. Smith
Case No.: 94-3364-CR, 94-3365-CR, 94-3366-CR and 94-3367-CR
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16974 - 2012-03-26
Case No.: 94-3364-CR, 94-3365-CR, 94-3366-CR and 94-3367-CR
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16974 - 2012-03-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
but respectful to the officers” and that he was recording to “make a record” of the incident in case “someone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117692 - 2017-09-21
but respectful to the officers” and that he was recording to “make a record” of the incident in case “someone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117692 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case, and that the court did not err by finding Jacobson guilty of speeding. Therefore, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=657008 - 2023-05-16
in this case, and that the court did not err by finding Jacobson guilty of speeding. Therefore, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=657008 - 2023-05-16
State v. Michael V. Hendricks
related to his case. In this, his second appeal, Hendricks appeals from: (1) an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18615 - 2005-06-20
related to his case. In this, his second appeal, Hendricks appeals from: (1) an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18615 - 2005-06-20
[PDF]
State v. Joseph Hazen
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9075 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9075 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. 1 Appeal No. 2008AP494-CR arises from circuit court case No. 2001CF5821 and involves one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35201 - 2014-09-15
. 1 Appeal No. 2008AP494-CR arises from circuit court case No. 2001CF5821 and involves one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35201 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Douglas Wolff
, it argues that neither defense counsel nor the prosecutor elicited evidence of the result. In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10701 - 2017-09-20
, it argues that neither defense counsel nor the prosecutor elicited evidence of the result. In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10701 - 2017-09-20
State v. Charles S. Russell
the insufficiency of the evidence supporting Russell’s theory of the case. Thus, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20514 - 2005-12-06
the insufficiency of the evidence supporting Russell’s theory of the case. Thus, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20514 - 2005-12-06
[PDF]
William J. Rhode v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
that the agency’s legal conclusions in this case are entitled to great weight. First, the legislature has charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11811 - 2017-09-21
that the agency’s legal conclusions in this case are entitled to great weight. First, the legislature has charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11811 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
required that these reports be signed by the attorneys trying the case. Other provisions set discovery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30553 - 2007-10-09
required that these reports be signed by the attorneys trying the case. Other provisions set discovery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30553 - 2007-10-09