Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31841 - 31850 of 43184 for t o.
Search results 31841 - 31850 of 43184 for t o.
[PDF]
Douglas County v. Steven Leinweber
from a judgment of the circuit court for Douglas County: MICHAEL T. LUCCI, Judge. Affirmed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2225 - 2017-09-19
from a judgment of the circuit court for Douglas County: MICHAEL T. LUCCI, Judge. Affirmed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2225 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Robert E. Koutnik, Jr.
is highly deferential and “[t]he reasonableness of counsel’s actions may be determined or substantially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4114 - 2017-09-20
is highly deferential and “[t]he reasonableness of counsel’s actions may be determined or substantially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4114 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Andre M. Pirtle
claim. “In order to show prejudice, `[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9496 - 2017-09-19
claim. “In order to show prejudice, `[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9496 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Faye W. Lloyd
, defense counsel stated, “[T]here is no criminal case to throw this lady in jail. There is nothing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9595 - 2017-09-19
, defense counsel stated, “[T]here is no criminal case to throw this lady in jail. There is nothing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9595 - 2017-09-19
State v. Timothy J. Meddaugh
to the United States Constitution provides that “[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3714 - 2005-03-31
to the United States Constitution provides that “[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3714 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 56
appeals. Discussion ¶11 Here, the facts are undisputed. “[T]he interpretation and application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=994596 - 2025-11-19
appeals. Discussion ¶11 Here, the facts are undisputed. “[T]he interpretation and application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=994596 - 2025-11-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, but there is no maximum age for the Substance Abuse Program. ¶16 We agree with the State that “[i]t is clear from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141238 - 2015-05-04
, but there is no maximum age for the Substance Abuse Program. ¶16 We agree with the State that “[i]t is clear from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141238 - 2015-05-04
Ronald Berry v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
of § 108.04(7)(am), Stats., as follows: [T]he commission does not require that an employe be able
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12014 - 2005-03-31
of § 108.04(7)(am), Stats., as follows: [T]he commission does not require that an employe be able
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12014 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Elliott D. Ray
]t’s a good strategy. It’s a good bill of goods, if you will, to admit to that felon in possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5074 - 2017-09-19
]t’s a good strategy. It’s a good bill of goods, if you will, to admit to that felon in possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5074 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
: “[T]he defendant claims there is information on the original video that could be exculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36725 - 2014-09-15
: “[T]he defendant claims there is information on the original video that could be exculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36725 - 2014-09-15