Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31861 - 31870 of 37737 for d's.
Search results 31861 - 31870 of 37737 for d's.
[PDF]
State v. David J. Lenz
of Steven D. Phillips, state public defender. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the plaintiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15332 - 2017-09-21
of Steven D. Phillips, state public defender. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the plaintiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15332 - 2017-09-21
Mary Carolyn Iverson v. Robert Iverson
is classified as marital property under s. 766.63. (d) By a decree, marital property agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6263 - 2005-03-31
is classified as marital property under s. 766.63. (d) By a decree, marital property agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6263 - 2005-03-31
Kimberly Paswaters v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
of the defendants-respondents, the cause was submitted on the brief of Colleen D. Ball of Wauwatosa and William R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7332 - 2005-03-31
of the defendants-respondents, the cause was submitted on the brief of Colleen D. Ball of Wauwatosa and William R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7332 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 888 N.W.2d 816 (quoting Daniel D. Blinka, The Daubert Standard in Wisconsin: A Primer, WIS. LAWYER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197053 - 2017-09-27
, 888 N.W.2d 816 (quoting Daniel D. Blinka, The Daubert Standard in Wisconsin: A Primer, WIS. LAWYER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197053 - 2017-09-27
[PDF]
State v. Kendric J. Winters
is no appreciable evidence supporting Winters’s mitigating “defensive force” theory. D. Evidentiary Rulings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12301 - 2017-09-21
is no appreciable evidence supporting Winters’s mitigating “defensive force” theory. D. Evidentiary Rulings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12301 - 2017-09-21
State v. Yolanda L.
is affirmed. D. Insufficient Evidence ¶22 Finally, Yolanda L. argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5811 - 2005-03-31
is affirmed. D. Insufficient Evidence ¶22 Finally, Yolanda L. argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5811 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 59
. No. 2018AP547 3 STAT. §§ 59.692(1)(b), 281.31(2)(d). In 2016, Anderson submitted a certified survey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249296 - 2019-12-06
. No. 2018AP547 3 STAT. §§ 59.692(1)(b), 281.31(2)(d). In 2016, Anderson submitted a certified survey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249296 - 2019-12-06
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
Arg. or Brief Subm. CA Dist./ Cty. CA Decision 2024AP1390 Waukesha County v. R. D. T
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040297 - 2025-11-17
Arg. or Brief Subm. CA Dist./ Cty. CA Decision 2024AP1390 Waukesha County v. R. D. T
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040297 - 2025-11-17
State v. Brian J. Salentine
to the approval of the court. (d)Not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect. Salentine also notes how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10122 - 2005-03-31
to the approval of the court. (d)Not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect. Salentine also notes how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10122 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jonathan L. Franklin
of heart,’” argues that the circuit court “misstate[d] … the law!” when it said at one point in its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14413 - 2014-09-15
of heart,’” argues that the circuit court “misstate[d] … the law!” when it said at one point in its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14413 - 2014-09-15