Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31871 - 31880 of 69480 for as he.
Search results 31871 - 31880 of 69480 for as he.
[PDF]
State v. Louis H. LaCount
(Ct. App. 1996). Finally, LaCount does not assert that he sought a restitution hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11225 - 2017-09-19
(Ct. App. 1996). Finally, LaCount does not assert that he sought a restitution hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11225 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of his property that he claims should be classified as agricultural. This is the third time Sabol has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34970 - 2008-12-22
of his property that he claims should be classified as agricultural. This is the third time Sabol has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34970 - 2008-12-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
such as Coleman’s understanding of the nature of the charge and the range of punishments he faced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=860562 - 2024-10-10
such as Coleman’s understanding of the nature of the charge and the range of punishments he faced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=860562 - 2024-10-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. was provided with a copy of the report and informed of his right to file a response, which he has not done
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1076411 - 2026-02-11
. was provided with a copy of the report and informed of his right to file a response, which he has not done
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1076411 - 2026-02-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
modification. He argued he was entitled to sentence modification because the circuit court’s sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017623 - 2025-10-01
modification. He argued he was entitled to sentence modification because the circuit court’s sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017623 - 2025-10-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
on Obermeier’s property and suggesting he fill in his property. ¶4 In response to Obermeier’s concern about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39687 - 2014-09-15
on Obermeier’s property and suggesting he fill in his property. ¶4 In response to Obermeier’s concern about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39687 - 2014-09-15
City of Racine v. Robert Robinson
in a civil forfeiture action. On appeal, Robinson argues that because he did not have notice of the date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9113 - 2005-03-31
in a civil forfeiture action. On appeal, Robinson argues that because he did not have notice of the date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9113 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as a persistent repeater. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion in which he requested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97184 - 2014-09-15
as a persistent repeater. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion in which he requested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97184 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
modification. He argued he was entitled to sentence modification because the circuit court’s sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017623 - 2025-10-01
modification. He argued he was entitled to sentence modification because the circuit court’s sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017623 - 2025-10-01
North Central Crop Insurance, Inc. v. Dan W. Dumke
. and Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance Company (collectively, Farmers) for premiums for crop insurance. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6913 - 2005-03-31
. and Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance Company (collectively, Farmers) for premiums for crop insurance. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6913 - 2005-03-31