Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31871 - 31880 of 97585 for court records search online.
Search results 31871 - 31880 of 97585 for court records search online.
[PDF]
State v. Timothy D. Lewis
seeking discovery of the victim’s medical records. Lewis claims the trial court erred when it denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4118 - 2017-09-20
seeking discovery of the victim’s medical records. Lewis claims the trial court erred when it denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4118 - 2017-09-20
State v. Timothy D. Lewis
postconviction order seeking discovery of the victim’s medical records. Lewis claims the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4118 - 2005-03-31
postconviction order seeking discovery of the victim’s medical records. Lewis claims the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4118 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
by credible and substantial evidence. The court noted its reading of the medical records indicated Kampa
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26624 - 2014-09-15
by credible and substantial evidence. The court noted its reading of the medical records indicated Kampa
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26624 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
key witnesses and the trial court erred by permitting the jury to view a video recording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33598 - 2014-09-15
key witnesses and the trial court erred by permitting the jury to view a video recording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33598 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
to the sentence imposed, the record reveals that the circuit court’s sentencing decision had a “rational
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103604 - 2013-10-29
to the sentence imposed, the record reveals that the circuit court’s sentencing decision had a “rational
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103604 - 2013-10-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. See RULE 809.19(1)(d), (e). A reviewing court is not required to sift through the record for facts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632888 - 2023-03-14
. See RULE 809.19(1)(d), (e). A reviewing court is not required to sift through the record for facts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632888 - 2023-03-14
Frontsheet
the record of the sentencing hearing demonstrates that the court actually considered the sentencing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29552 - 2007-06-28
the record of the sentencing hearing demonstrates that the court actually considered the sentencing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29552 - 2007-06-28
[PDF]
State v. Robert L. Von Haden, Jr.
in camera review of the State’s expert witness’s records was improper; (7) the court erred by overruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7060 - 2017-09-20
in camera review of the State’s expert witness’s records was improper; (7) the court erred by overruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7060 - 2017-09-20
State v. Robert L. Von Haden, Jr.
of the State’s expert witness’s records was improper; (7) the court erred by overruling his objection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7060 - 2005-03-31
of the State’s expert witness’s records was improper; (7) the court erred by overruling his objection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7060 - 2005-03-31
Robert Anthony Lee v. C.O. Lutzow
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED August 24, 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7952 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED August 24, 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7952 - 2005-03-31