Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31871 - 31880 of 64077 for records/1000.
Search results 31871 - 31880 of 64077 for records/1000.
State v. James Kevin Harvey
the orders and the record supports both findings, we affirm the orders. ¶2 Harvey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6355 - 2005-03-31
the orders and the record supports both findings, we affirm the orders. ¶2 Harvey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6355 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Devinney to supplement the record with an affidavit. Devinney’s affidavit stated Young did not represent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26653 - 2006-10-02
Devinney to supplement the record with an affidavit. Devinney’s affidavit stated Young did not represent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26653 - 2006-10-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewed the entire records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526663 - 2022-06-01
reviewed the entire records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526663 - 2022-06-01
State v. Gary A. Malkmus
indicates that a certified copy of the defendant's prior record was on file with the Court in the [check
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11446 - 2005-03-31
indicates that a certified copy of the defendant's prior record was on file with the Court in the [check
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11446 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gary A. Malkmus
indicates that a certified copy of the defendant's prior record was on file with the Court in the [check
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11445 - 2005-03-31
indicates that a certified copy of the defendant's prior record was on file with the Court in the [check
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11445 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, this court concludes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187471 - 2017-09-21
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, this court concludes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187471 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James Podlewski
to anything in the record that remotely suggests that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13719 - 2014-09-15
to anything in the record that remotely suggests that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13719 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at 1 All references
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163067 - 2017-09-21
of the briefs and record, we conclude at 1 All references
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163067 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Evelio Duarte-Vestar
-CM-1307, the record reflects that Duarte-Vestar was not convicted of aggravated battery, only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15257 - 2017-09-21
-CM-1307, the record reflects that Duarte-Vestar was not convicted of aggravated battery, only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15257 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the appellant’s brief and the record. On July 14, 2017, in a third order, this court informed Savvy Woman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194807 - 2017-09-21
on the appellant’s brief and the record. On July 14, 2017, in a third order, this court informed Savvy Woman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194807 - 2017-09-21