Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31871 - 31880 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 31871 - 31880 of 58506 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an order denying her postconviction motion for a new trial. Hoppe claims that her trial counsel provided
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259191 - 2020-05-05
an order denying her postconviction motion for a new trial. Hoppe claims that her trial counsel provided
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259191 - 2020-05-05
State v. Daniel H. Frasch
the statutory time frame. This court considers the trial court's statement that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10272 - 2005-03-31
the statutory time frame. This court considers the trial court's statement that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10272 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Cosby guilty of both charges after a trial. A.L. did not testify at trial. On appeal, Cosby
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=383056 - 2021-07-01
Cosby guilty of both charges after a trial. A.L. did not testify at trial. On appeal, Cosby
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=383056 - 2021-07-01
Mary Jane M. v. Milwaukee County
Jane should be appointed as the new guardian. The issue in this appeal is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3202 - 2005-03-31
Jane should be appointed as the new guardian. The issue in this appeal is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3202 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that it was not necessary for the trial court to engage in a personal colloquy with Harper about his decision to forego
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97209 - 2014-09-15
that it was not necessary for the trial court to engage in a personal colloquy with Harper about his decision to forego
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97209 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
a protective order, alleging delay, harassment, and that the issues were moot. The trial court rejected
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147270 - 2015-09-01
a protective order, alleging delay, harassment, and that the issues were moot. The trial court rejected
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147270 - 2015-09-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to injure or accuse of a crime.2 During closing argument at trial, the prosecutor told the jury “what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80927 - 2014-09-15
to injure or accuse of a crime.2 During closing argument at trial, the prosecutor told the jury “what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80927 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Mary Jane M. v. Milwaukee County
. The issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly determined that the petition failed to allege
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3202 - 2017-09-19
. The issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly determined that the petition failed to allege
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3202 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
argued that he was not fully aware of the elements and nature of the offenses and that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86885 - 2012-09-10
argued that he was not fully aware of the elements and nature of the offenses and that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86885 - 2012-09-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
requested a new trial or resentencing based on newly discovered evidence. A jury convicted Jardine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36912 - 2014-09-15
requested a new trial or resentencing based on newly discovered evidence. A jury convicted Jardine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36912 - 2014-09-15