Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31881 - 31890 of 64609 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 31881 - 31890 of 64609 for divorce records/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
exercises its discretion when it considers the relevant facts of record, applies the correct legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243491 - 2019-07-11
exercises its discretion when it considers the relevant facts of record, applies the correct legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243491 - 2019-07-11
Frontsheet
been filed. The referee's findings and conclusions are supported by the record. We conclude Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46692 - 2010-02-02
been filed. The referee's findings and conclusions are supported by the record. We conclude Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46692 - 2010-02-02
[PDF]
State v. Joseph L. Kohls
). The record must show that the trial court exercised its discretion and stated its reasons for the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2687 - 2017-09-19
). The record must show that the trial court exercised its discretion and stated its reasons for the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2687 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2022AP1476-CRNM 2 merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=816798 - 2024-06-26
. No. 2022AP1476-CRNM 2 merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=816798 - 2024-06-26
CA Blank Order
right to file a response, but he has not done so. After reviewing the no-merit report and the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110177 - 2014-04-07
right to file a response, but he has not done so. After reviewing the no-merit report and the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110177 - 2014-04-07
State v. William R. Peterson
discretion based solely on the facts of record. ΒΆ6 On remand, the trial court again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14985 - 2005-03-31
discretion based solely on the facts of record. ΒΆ6 On remand, the trial court again
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14985 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a supplemental no-merit report. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162935 - 2017-09-21
a supplemental no-merit report. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162935 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Thomas E. Richmond
exercised its discretion. Kohlhoff v. State, 85 Wis.2d 148, 159, 270 N.W.2d 63, 68 (1978). If the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11331 - 2017-09-19
exercised its discretion. Kohlhoff v. State, 85 Wis.2d 148, 159, 270 N.W.2d 63, 68 (1978). If the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11331 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
in the record to dispute the fact that Exhibit B, attached to correspondence dated 6/15/2010 from the law firm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93178 - 2013-02-20
in the record to dispute the fact that Exhibit B, attached to correspondence dated 6/15/2010 from the law firm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93178 - 2013-02-20
[PDF]
Patricia A.M. v. Patricia S.
will affirm a discretionary decision if the trial court relies on facts of record, applies the proper legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3212 - 2017-09-19
will affirm a discretionary decision if the trial court relies on facts of record, applies the proper legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3212 - 2017-09-19