Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31891 - 31900 of 69024 for had.
Search results 31891 - 31900 of 69024 for had.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the Rosado new factor test had been incorrectly modified by cases that added the additional requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66789 - 2014-09-15
that the Rosado new factor test had been incorrectly modified by cases that added the additional requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66789 - 2014-09-15
State v. Tod A. Bergemann
. Three of the victims testified that Bergemann had threatened them. Bergemann’s treatment history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13452 - 2005-03-31
. Three of the victims testified that Bergemann had threatened them. Bergemann’s treatment history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13452 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the circuit court concluded that he had to seek relief via a writ petition in the circuit court. The court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116632 - 2017-09-21
, the circuit court concluded that he had to seek relief via a writ petition in the circuit court. The court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116632 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. John W. Rodgers
hearing, the Detroit DEA agent testified that a paid, confidential informant who had no pending charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9363 - 2017-09-19
hearing, the Detroit DEA agent testified that a paid, confidential informant who had no pending charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9363 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
for a mistrial because the inadmissible testimony suggesting Knapp had a prior conviction was not sufficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49214 - 2014-09-15
for a mistrial because the inadmissible testimony suggesting Knapp had a prior conviction was not sufficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49214 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. David Mikel
. The court ascertained that Mikel’s counsel had had a sufficient opportunity to discuss the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12419 - 2017-09-21
. The court ascertained that Mikel’s counsel had had a sufficient opportunity to discuss the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12419 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the circuit court erred in dismissing its annexation challenge. The City claims that it had standing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185462 - 2017-09-21
that the circuit court erred in dismissing its annexation challenge. The City claims that it had standing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185462 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
suppression motion. Because we conclude the officer had both probable cause and reasonable suspicion to stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61586 - 2011-03-21
suppression motion. Because we conclude the officer had both probable cause and reasonable suspicion to stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61586 - 2011-03-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that the restaurant had two main areas: the front customer lobby and a place in the back for employees that had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31225 - 2007-12-17
that the restaurant had two main areas: the front customer lobby and a place in the back for employees that had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31225 - 2007-12-17
Julie A. Haslbeck v. Darren Haslbeck
. Darren and Julie were divorced on August 26, 1993. They had one child and were awarded joint custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9162 - 2005-03-31
. Darren and Julie were divorced on August 26, 1993. They had one child and were awarded joint custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9162 - 2005-03-31