Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31891 - 31900 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 31891 - 31900 of 58285 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Robert P. Behm
a motor vehicle while intoxicated, in violation of § 346.63(1)(a), STATS.1 Behm contends that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13697 - 2014-09-15
a motor vehicle while intoxicated, in violation of § 346.63(1)(a), STATS.1 Behm contends that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13697 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 22, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
trial, the jury found Barber not guilty. ¶3 Thirteen months later, the State charged Barber
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27228 - 2006-11-21
trial, the jury found Barber not guilty. ¶3 Thirteen months later, the State charged Barber
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27228 - 2006-11-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
claims that the trial court erred in denying her motion because the underlying judgments were void due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35633 - 2014-09-15
claims that the trial court erred in denying her motion because the underlying judgments were void due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35633 - 2014-09-15
State v. Robert P. Behm
a motor vehicle while intoxicated, in violation of § 346.63(1)(a), Stats.[1] Behm contends that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13697 - 2005-03-31
a motor vehicle while intoxicated, in violation of § 346.63(1)(a), Stats.[1] Behm contends that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13697 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Jaster. Lemel Homes claims the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Whitefish Bay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29760 - 2007-07-23
Jaster. Lemel Homes claims the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of Whitefish Bay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29760 - 2007-07-23
[PDF]
Pekay Speciality Contracting v. Madson Tiling & Excavating, Inc.
the trial court’s finding that Madson’s answer was timely filed and that the court’s previous order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12812 - 2017-09-21
the trial court’s finding that Madson’s answer was timely filed and that the court’s previous order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12812 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of $1,936.91. Trial counsel explained at the sentencing hearing that he and Haley had reviewed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362377 - 2021-05-04
of $1,936.91. Trial counsel explained at the sentencing hearing that he and Haley had reviewed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362377 - 2021-05-04
State v. Kemmick D. Holmes
from a judgment of conviction and an order denying him postconviction relief. He claims that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15633 - 2005-03-31
from a judgment of conviction and an order denying him postconviction relief. He claims that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15633 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to review the elements of party to a crime liability, and the jury instructions provided by trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226347 - 2018-11-01
to review the elements of party to a crime liability, and the jury instructions provided by trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226347 - 2018-11-01
Uni-General Corporation v. Century 21 Great American Homes, Inc.
American Homes, a Maurer-Christensen Corporation.[1] Uni-General argues that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14049 - 2005-03-31
American Homes, a Maurer-Christensen Corporation.[1] Uni-General argues that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14049 - 2005-03-31