Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3191 - 3200 of 70407 for hi.
Search results 3191 - 3200 of 70407 for hi.
State v. Howard L. Goodman
CURIAM. Howard Goodman appeals judgments sentencing him after revocation of his probation and an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5515 - 2005-03-31
CURIAM. Howard Goodman appeals judgments sentencing him after revocation of his probation and an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5515 - 2005-03-31
Patrick T. Cowan v.
for six months as discipline for professional misconduct. That misconduct consisted of his continuing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16993 - 2005-03-31
for six months as discipline for professional misconduct. That misconduct consisted of his continuing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16993 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the individual voir dire of jurors; (2) was denied due process because he did not waive his right to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52724 - 2010-08-02
the individual voir dire of jurors; (2) was denied due process because he did not waive his right to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52724 - 2010-08-02
State v. Howard L. Goodman
CURIAM. Howard Goodman appeals judgments sentencing him after revocation of his probation and an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5516 - 2005-03-31
CURIAM. Howard Goodman appeals judgments sentencing him after revocation of his probation and an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5516 - 2005-03-31
State v. Leamon Hoover
safety, see Wis. Stat. § 941.30(1), and from the trial court’s denial of his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14784 - 2005-03-31
safety, see Wis. Stat. § 941.30(1), and from the trial court’s denial of his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14784 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
arguments on appeal: (1) his right to a speedy trial was violated; (2) unreasonable discovery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133722 - 2017-09-21
arguments on appeal: (1) his right to a speedy trial was violated; (2) unreasonable discovery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133722 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Emmett White
appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. White raises the following issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10472 - 2017-09-20
appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. White raises the following issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10472 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
) his right to a speedy trial was violated; (2) unreasonable discovery restrictions violated his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133722 - 2015-01-26
) his right to a speedy trial was violated; (2) unreasonable discovery restrictions violated his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133722 - 2015-01-26
State v. John R. Calkins
: michael fisher, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 ANDERSON, P.J.[1] John R. Calkins contends that his current
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6922 - 2005-03-31
: michael fisher, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 ANDERSON, P.J.[1] John R. Calkins contends that his current
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6922 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Richard T. Peffer
. ¶1 SCHUDSON, J.1 Richard T. Peffer appeals from the judgment of conviction, following his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2188 - 2017-09-19
. ¶1 SCHUDSON, J.1 Richard T. Peffer appeals from the judgment of conviction, following his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2188 - 2017-09-19