Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3191 - 3200 of 12873 for se.
Search results 3191 - 3200 of 12873 for se.
Odis Purifoy v. Ron Malone
se. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the respondents-respondents, the cause was submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4244 - 2005-03-31
se. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the respondents-respondents, the cause was submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4244 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
2009. No. 2009AP3071 2 ¶1 CURLEY, P.J. Brian E. Davis, pro se, appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56188 - 2014-09-15
2009. No. 2009AP3071 2 ¶1 CURLEY, P.J. Brian E. Davis, pro se, appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56188 - 2014-09-15
State v. Milton L. Reed
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Milton L. Reed, acting pro se, appeals from the order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15162 - 2005-03-31
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Milton L. Reed, acting pro se, appeals from the order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15162 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and evidence he needed” because he proceeded pro se throughout the proceedings and was thus unaware
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72231 - 2011-10-12
and evidence he needed” because he proceeded pro se throughout the proceedings and was thus unaware
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72231 - 2011-10-12
State v. Daniel Rodriguez
the presumption that the entry into the home was unreasonable per se, we reverse the judgment and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3047 - 2005-03-31
the presumption that the entry into the home was unreasonable per se, we reverse the judgment and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3047 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). No. 2020AP1809-CR 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Ronald E. Schroeder, pro se, appeals from orders denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=665431 - 2023-06-07
). No. 2020AP1809-CR 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Ronald E. Schroeder, pro se, appeals from orders denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=665431 - 2023-06-07
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. Aman Deep Singh, pro se, appeals the order denying his motion for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134577 - 2015-02-09
PER CURIAM. Aman Deep Singh, pro se, appeals the order denying his motion for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134577 - 2015-02-09
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. Gene Wolske, Jr., appeals pro se from judgments[1] convicting him as a repeat offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134389 - 2015-02-10
PER CURIAM. Gene Wolske, Jr., appeals pro se from judgments[1] convicting him as a repeat offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134389 - 2015-02-10
[PDF]
State v. Daniel Rodriguez
into the home was unreasonable per se, we reverse the judgment and remand with directions to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3047 - 2017-09-19
into the home was unreasonable per se, we reverse the judgment and remand with directions to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3047 - 2017-09-19
Albert A. Tadych v. Waukesha County
CURIAM. Albert A. Tadych appeals pro se from a judgment dismissing his claims against Waukesha County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15668 - 2005-03-31
CURIAM. Albert A. Tadych appeals pro se from a judgment dismissing his claims against Waukesha County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15668 - 2005-03-31