Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31901 - 31910 of 97712 for civil court case status online.
Search results 31901 - 31910 of 97712 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 4, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89958 - 2012-12-03
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 4, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89958 - 2012-12-03
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 29, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32517 - 2008-04-28
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 29, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32517 - 2008-04-28
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 9, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34253 - 2008-10-08
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 9, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34253 - 2008-10-08
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 26, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98529 - 2013-06-25
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 26, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98529 - 2013-06-25
COURT OF APPEALS
not address all issues raised when deciding case on other grounds). By the Court.—Judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99291 - 2013-07-16
not address all issues raised when deciding case on other grounds). By the Court.—Judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99291 - 2013-07-16
COURT OF APPEALS
for extrinsic evidence to discern its meaning. Because the trial court did not do so in this case, we reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63724 - 2011-05-09
for extrinsic evidence to discern its meaning. Because the trial court did not do so in this case, we reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63724 - 2011-05-09
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 11, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86833 - 2012-09-10
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 11, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86833 - 2012-09-10
COURT OF APPEALS
case. Id. The findings of fact made by the trial court in evaluating the maintenance objectives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35595 - 2009-02-24
case. Id. The findings of fact made by the trial court in evaluating the maintenance objectives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35595 - 2009-02-24
COURT OF APPEALS
shall be reviewed by the judge of the branch of court to which the case has been assigned, upon motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32736 - 2008-05-19
shall be reviewed by the judge of the branch of court to which the case has been assigned, upon motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32736 - 2008-05-19
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 11, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47834 - 2010-03-10
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 11, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47834 - 2010-03-10