Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31901 - 31910 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 31901 - 31910 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
, “[t]he record speaks for itself in this case.” The sentencing transcript shows that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71632 - 2011-10-03
, “[t]he record speaks for itself in this case.” The sentencing transcript shows that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71632 - 2011-10-03
COURT OF APPEALS
, Smith did not appear at the hearing, and the court commissioner dismissed his case without prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131639 - 2014-12-16
, Smith did not appear at the hearing, and the court commissioner dismissed his case without prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131639 - 2014-12-16
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 12, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33004 - 2008-06-11
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 12, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33004 - 2008-06-11
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 30, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107458 - 2014-01-29
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 30, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107458 - 2014-01-29
COURT OF APPEALS
be involuntary. Id. at 307-08. However, the court did not hold that the confession in that case was, in fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43713 - 2009-11-18
be involuntary. Id. at 307-08. However, the court did not hold that the confession in that case was, in fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43713 - 2009-11-18
COURT OF APPEALS
the victim. The trial court denied Kamlager’s motion to suppress. The case went to a five-day jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30311 - 2007-09-18
the victim. The trial court denied Kamlager’s motion to suppress. The case went to a five-day jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30311 - 2007-09-18
COURT OF APPEALS
restriction ordinance in this case. ¶10 Issue 6. Should the trial court have engaged in certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33851 - 2008-08-27
restriction ordinance in this case. ¶10 Issue 6. Should the trial court have engaged in certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33851 - 2008-08-27
COURT OF APPEALS
The present case does not involve a situation where the court granted a divorce judgment or otherwise sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33178 - 2008-06-25
The present case does not involve a situation where the court granted a divorce judgment or otherwise sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33178 - 2008-06-25
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 17, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36796 - 2009-06-16
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 17, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36796 - 2009-06-16
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 15, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79523 - 2012-03-14
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 15, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79523 - 2012-03-14