Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31911 - 31920 of 34008 for dismissed.

State v. Antonio M. Perkins
to § 940.225(3m).[1] He argues that the trial court erred by: (1) denying his motion to dismiss based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9062 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. George Melvin Taylor
to come forward with a neutral explanation for challenging [the dismissed venireperson]” and “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6560 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Charles J. Benoit
deliberating fairly. After this juror was dismissed for cause, no other jurors responded. Of the twelve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14079 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Arik J. Guenther
be dismissed on grounds that it is generally based on the same facts as Count 14 in the earlier case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19060 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Chapter House Company, were dismissed from the suit by stipulation. ¶12 The remaining defendants all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79061 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Scott Leason Badker
and by refusing to dismiss the charge of hiding a corpse due to insufficient evidence. Because investigators
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16191 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Arthur Beiersdorf
to dismiss the two misdemeanor sexual intercourse charges. For second-degree sexual assault, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9012 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Published Order
and proposed by the Independent Redistricting Committee: the trial court declined to dismiss the plaintiff's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=714135 - 2024-01-08

State v. Thomas M. Stockland
, the State will move to merge and dismiss the charge of operating with a prohibited alcohol concentration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5541 - 2005-03-31

State v. Timmy J. Reichling
should be dismissed from the jury panel is a matter within the trial court's discretion. State v. Gesch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7957 - 2005-03-31