Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31911 - 31920 of 75348 for judgment for us.
Search results 31911 - 31920 of 75348 for judgment for us.
[PDF]
Donald E. Cavanaugh v. Robert Andrade
of the court of appeals that reversed a judgment against the City and affirmed a judgment against Andrade
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16896 - 2017-09-21
of the court of appeals that reversed a judgment against the City and affirmed a judgment against Andrade
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16896 - 2017-09-21
Donald E. Cavanaugh v. Robert Andrade
of the court of appeals that reversed a judgment against the City and affirmed a judgment against Andrade
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16896 - 2005-03-31
of the court of appeals that reversed a judgment against the City and affirmed a judgment against Andrade
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16896 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Adrienne Luber
The court entered a judgment of acquittal on the OWI charge and declared a mistrial on the PAC charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2275 - 2017-09-19
The court entered a judgment of acquittal on the OWI charge and declared a mistrial on the PAC charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2275 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” testimony, as well as to No. 2014AP2083 6 Jurek’s use of a “mathematical formula” to estimate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146989 - 2017-09-21
” testimony, as well as to No. 2014AP2083 6 Jurek’s use of a “mathematical formula” to estimate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146989 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
as to Jurek’s use of a “mathematical formula” to estimate Phillips’ lifetime reoffense risk. Second, Phillips
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146989 - 2015-08-24
as to Jurek’s use of a “mathematical formula” to estimate Phillips’ lifetime reoffense risk. Second, Phillips
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146989 - 2015-08-24
Michael S. Elkins v. Gary McCaughtry
to appeal the warden’s decision to the ICE. However, Elkins’s briefs confuse the issue. He appears to use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5279 - 2005-03-31
to appeal the warden’s decision to the ICE. However, Elkins’s briefs confuse the issue. He appears to use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5279 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Michael S. Elkins v. Gary McCaughtry
confuse the issue. He appears to use “Step 1” and “Step 2” interchangeably to refer to the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5279 - 2017-09-19
confuse the issue. He appears to use “Step 1” and “Step 2” interchangeably to refer to the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5279 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 1 For ease of reading, we use pseudonyms in this confidential matter when referring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=589777 - 2022-11-15
. 1 For ease of reading, we use pseudonyms in this confidential matter when referring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=589777 - 2022-11-15
Frontsheet
, the date when the six-month period commences cannot be established. Since the record before us does
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28586 - 2007-03-26
, the date when the six-month period commences cannot be established. Since the record before us does
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28586 - 2007-03-26
[PDF]
WI 38
cannot be established. Since the record before us does not prove that the City served the notice
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28586 - 2014-09-15
cannot be established. Since the record before us does not prove that the City served the notice
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28586 - 2014-09-15