Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31911 - 31920 of 63619 for records.
Search results 31911 - 31920 of 63619 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that denied his motion for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214170 - 2018-06-11
that denied his motion for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214170 - 2018-06-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to process” that was not supported by evidence in the record. ¶5 In response, the State argues first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264840 - 2020-06-18
to process” that was not supported by evidence in the record. ¶5 In response, the State argues first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264840 - 2020-06-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the ordinance at issue cannot be determined from this record, this court reverses and remands with directions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93963 - 2014-09-15
of the ordinance at issue cannot be determined from this record, this court reverses and remands with directions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93963 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
; (3) the record does not support the trial court’s finding that Beaver continued to pursue claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29416 - 2014-09-15
; (3) the record does not support the trial court’s finding that Beaver continued to pursue claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29416 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James W. Keith
of these events occurred outside Officer Krueger’s jurisdiction. Nothing in the record suggests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5000 - 2017-09-19
of these events occurred outside Officer Krueger’s jurisdiction. Nothing in the record suggests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5000 - 2017-09-19
2010 WI APP 161
is required to demonstrate on the record a proper exercise of discretion when imposing a DNA surcharge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56896 - 2011-08-21
is required to demonstrate on the record a proper exercise of discretion when imposing a DNA surcharge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56896 - 2011-08-21
State v. Daniel Marcellus Johnson
the record; it confirms Johnson’s position. The State, citing State ex rel. Oliver v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11940 - 2005-03-31
the record; it confirms Johnson’s position. The State, citing State ex rel. Oliver v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11940 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Phone records admitted at trial indicate that on October 29, John George placed two short calls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56222 - 2010-11-01
. Phone records admitted at trial indicate that on October 29, John George placed two short calls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56222 - 2010-11-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=908197 - 2025-02-05
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=908197 - 2025-02-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this matter is No. 2020AP756-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=365227 - 2021-05-11
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this matter is No. 2020AP756-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=365227 - 2021-05-11