Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31921 - 31930 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 31921 - 31930 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 18, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32109 - 2008-03-17
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 18, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32109 - 2008-03-17
COURT OF APPEALS
Gorden incorrectly claims the circuit court “made absolutely no conclusions of law.” This is not a case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42977 - 2009-11-02
Gorden incorrectly claims the circuit court “made absolutely no conclusions of law.” This is not a case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42977 - 2009-11-02
COURT OF APPEALS
not the same. That may be true, but in this case the County conceded in the circuit court proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34251 - 2008-10-08
not the same. That may be true, but in this case the County conceded in the circuit court proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34251 - 2008-10-08
COURT OF APPEALS
[hygienist] cases this Court has seen there are very few dental [hygienists] in this county that work five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78931 - 2012-03-05
[hygienist] cases this Court has seen there are very few dental [hygienists] in this county that work five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78931 - 2012-03-05
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 27, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52601 - 2010-07-26
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 27, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52601 - 2010-07-26
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s decision on cross-motions for summary judgment. Our review of cases on appeal from summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52591 - 2010-07-26
court’s decision on cross-motions for summary judgment. Our review of cases on appeal from summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52591 - 2010-07-26
COURT OF APPEALS
, Deppiesse incorrectly states that “[t]he defense asserted in this case [in the trial court] was based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111764 - 2014-05-06
, Deppiesse incorrectly states that “[t]he defense asserted in this case [in the trial court] was based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111764 - 2014-05-06
COURT OF APPEALS
it again. The trial court ruled that it would exclude the evidence in the State’s case-in-chief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140750 - 2015-04-28
it again. The trial court ruled that it would exclude the evidence in the State’s case-in-chief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140750 - 2015-04-28
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 23, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34977 - 2008-12-22
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 23, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34977 - 2008-12-22
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 27, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49293 - 2010-04-26
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 27, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49293 - 2010-04-26