Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31921 - 31930 of 97712 for civil court case status online.
Search results 31921 - 31930 of 97712 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 17, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43370 - 2009-11-16
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 17, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43370 - 2009-11-16
COURT OF APPEALS
help to Angel, whose case must be distinguished due to the lack of a final court order or judgment from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35464 - 2009-02-10
help to Angel, whose case must be distinguished due to the lack of a final court order or judgment from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35464 - 2009-02-10
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 26, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63132 - 2011-04-25
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 26, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63132 - 2011-04-25
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 4, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42813 - 2009-11-03
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 4, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42813 - 2009-11-03
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 5, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30165 - 2007-09-04
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 5, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30165 - 2007-09-04
COURT OF APPEALS
is that the circuit court lost subject matter jurisdiction over his case when the State asserted during the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35203 - 2009-01-12
is that the circuit court lost subject matter jurisdiction over his case when the State asserted during the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35203 - 2009-01-12
COURT OF APPEALS
court in the present case concluded otherwise. As the court stated: At some point the vendor, just like
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48249 - 2010-03-22
court in the present case concluded otherwise. As the court stated: At some point the vendor, just like
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48249 - 2010-03-22
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 10, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28660 - 2007-04-09
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 10, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28660 - 2007-04-09
COURT OF APPEALS
whether the moving party has made a prima facie case for summary judgment. Id. If so, “the court must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93349 - 2013-02-25
whether the moving party has made a prima facie case for summary judgment. Id. If so, “the court must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93349 - 2013-02-25
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 3, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80278 - 2012-04-02
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 3, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80278 - 2012-04-02