Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31931 - 31940 of 68289 for law.
Search results 31931 - 31940 of 68289 for law.
Robin H. v. Ronald J.B.
discretion on the basis of an error of law or irrelevant or impermissible factors. Barstad v. Frazier, 118
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3049 - 2005-03-31
discretion on the basis of an error of law or irrelevant or impermissible factors. Barstad v. Frazier, 118
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3049 - 2005-03-31
William J. Dekker v. Dennis M. Wergin
is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See id. at 76, 568 N.W.2d at 304-05
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11692 - 2005-03-31
is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See id. at 76, 568 N.W.2d at 304-05
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11692 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
requirements. This presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Murdock, 2000 WI App 170
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125310 - 2014-10-27
requirements. This presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Murdock, 2000 WI App 170
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125310 - 2014-10-27
COURT OF APPEALS
agreed. It concluded that, as a matter of law, the latest that Griffin should have known of her injury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73496 - 2011-11-08
agreed. It concluded that, as a matter of law, the latest that Griffin should have known of her injury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73496 - 2011-11-08
COURT OF APPEALS
discretionary determination if the court examined the relevant facts, applied the appropriate law, and used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31654 - 2008-01-28
discretionary determination if the court examined the relevant facts, applied the appropriate law, and used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31654 - 2008-01-28
State v. Billye L. Massey
stamp law (“cocaine” convictions), and for possessing marijuana and felony bail-jumping (“marijuana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25064 - 2006-05-08
stamp law (“cocaine” convictions), and for possessing marijuana and felony bail-jumping (“marijuana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25064 - 2006-05-08
State v. Jerry C.O.
during the lawful execution of a Terry search.” Minnesota v. Dickerson, 508 U.S. 366, 374 (1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11213 - 2005-03-31
during the lawful execution of a Terry search.” Minnesota v. Dickerson, 508 U.S. 366, 374 (1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11213 - 2005-03-31
State v. Larry W. Norris
merit. In § 939.22(10), Stats., the first definition of “dangerous weapon” is “any firearm.” Case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11171 - 2013-12-16
merit. In § 939.22(10), Stats., the first definition of “dangerous weapon” is “any firearm.” Case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11171 - 2013-12-16
Christine E. Lukas v. Peter R. Kerr
be the product of a rational mental process by which the facts of record and law relied upon are stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7382 - 2005-03-31
be the product of a rational mental process by which the facts of record and law relied upon are stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7382 - 2005-03-31
Juniper Estates Compliance Committee Consisting of: v. Jerry Lydon
vote, regardless of subdividing. Interpretation of a restrictive covenant is a question of law we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9535 - 2005-03-31
vote, regardless of subdividing. Interpretation of a restrictive covenant is a question of law we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9535 - 2005-03-31