Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31931 - 31940 of 82874 for simple case search.
Search results 31931 - 31940 of 82874 for simple case search.
[PDF]
State v. Clark E. Varnell
to the prior conviction when he entered his guilty pleas to the charges in this case. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2659 - 2017-09-19
to the prior conviction when he entered his guilty pleas to the charges in this case. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2659 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147221 - 2017-09-21
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147221 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170316 - 2017-09-21
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170316 - 2017-09-21
State v. James E. Jones
for misdemeanor battery as a repeater imposed in another case.[2] Jones contends on appeal that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11206 - 2005-03-31
for misdemeanor battery as a repeater imposed in another case.[2] Jones contends on appeal that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11206 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dustin J. Johnson
County case No. 2002CF256, the State charged Johnson with aggravated battery as party to a crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24640 - 2006-03-27
County case No. 2002CF256, the State charged Johnson with aggravated battery as party to a crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24640 - 2006-03-27
City of Milwaukee v. Michael Frank Machnitzky
, and that there was no clear and justifiable excuse for the party’s noncompliance. In the instant case, the municipal court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12957 - 2005-03-31
, and that there was no clear and justifiable excuse for the party’s noncompliance. In the instant case, the municipal court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12957 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823702 - 2024-07-09
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823702 - 2024-07-09
[PDF]
State v. Scott T. Bidwell
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8802 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8802 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jameel A. Ali
reject his arguments and affirm. I. THE JURY INSTRUCTIONS This was a credibility case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9095 - 2017-09-19
reject his arguments and affirm. I. THE JURY INSTRUCTIONS This was a credibility case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9095 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Michael Ives v. Coopertools
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8867 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8867 - 2017-09-19