Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31941 - 31950 of 97712 for civil court case status online.

COURT OF APPEALS
Appellate review of the trial court’s verdict in this case is narrow; this court will sustain the verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130940 - 2014-12-01

COURT OF APPEALS
Exercised his discretion by severing twelve of the counts in the case For later trial. 2) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64235 - 2011-05-16

COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 30, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86551 - 2012-08-29

COURT OF APPEALS
remand the case to the circuit court to direct the Town of Norway Board of Zoning to reconsider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31988 - 2008-03-04

COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 19, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29357 - 2007-06-18

COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 16, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47886 - 2010-03-15

COURT OF APPEALS
the following passage from an Alaska Supreme Court case provides a useful illustration of what constitutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35587 - 2009-02-16

COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 3, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68843 - 2011-10-09

COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 6, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86799 - 2012-09-05

COURT OF APPEALS
a previous supreme court case.”). Conclusion ¶30 For the reasons discussed, we affirm the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83630 - 2012-06-13