Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31941 - 31950 of 40044 for financial disclosure statement.

COURT OF APPEALS
for the court, captured Lilly’s statements indicating that he planned to disrupt the trial.[3] After discussing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60511 - 2011-02-28

State v. James A. Schmidt
We do not view the Bryant court’s statement quoted in paragraph 21 as a holding that a request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7440 - 2005-03-31

[PDF]
page of a brief. S. CT. ORDER 20-07 cmt. at x1. No. 2023AP1519 5 statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795955 - 2024-05-28

COURT OF APPEALS
ultimately testified, the court had opined that Wakeman’s statement to police appeared to support a theory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33718 - 2008-08-11

[PDF] WI APP 36
the court’s statements that the prosecutor, in the words of the circuit court, “did everything she could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28134 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Mahlick D. Ellington
nested statements by Marilyn B. in the medical records are also nondiagnostic under Rundle. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20039 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
. Such testimony was clearly hearsay.... [I]f a statement does not fit one of the exceptions, it is inadmissible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58887 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
prior to the plea hearing,” including a “signed statement of the defendant which might demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713527 - 2023-10-11

[PDF] WI APP 193
. The Robinson court does not attribute or explain the “question of law” statement. Robinson, 249 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29733 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
waiver. Trial counsel made the following statement at that time: We will agree to waive our right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184692 - 2017-09-21