Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31941 - 31950 of 38502 for t's.
Search results 31941 - 31950 of 38502 for t's.
State v. Thomas S. Mayo
the prosecutor’s remark about “[t]he way a criminal case works,” the operation of the district attorney’s office
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24578 - 2006-03-28
the prosecutor’s remark about “[t]he way a criminal case works,” the operation of the district attorney’s office
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24578 - 2006-03-28
COURT OF APPEALS
is not hearsay if “[t]he declarant testifies at the trial or hearing and is subject to cross-examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57580 - 2010-12-08
is not hearsay if “[t]he declarant testifies at the trial or hearing and is subject to cross-examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57580 - 2010-12-08
State v. Robert Simmons
, 139‑40, 456 N.W.2d 830 (1990). Stated otherwise, to justify an investigatory stop, “[t]he police must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7353 - 2005-03-31
, 139‑40, 456 N.W.2d 830 (1990). Stated otherwise, to justify an investigatory stop, “[t]he police must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7353 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
: They got to my head. Dassey asserts that the comments “not really” and “[t]hey got to my head” amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92079 - 2013-01-29
: They got to my head. Dassey asserts that the comments “not really” and “[t]hey got to my head” amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92079 - 2013-01-29
Odis Purifoy v. Ron Malone
§ PAC 1.07(5)(c), states that when parole has been granted and later denied: [T]he inmate shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4244 - 2005-03-31
§ PAC 1.07(5)(c), states that when parole has been granted and later denied: [T]he inmate shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4244 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. and W. T. Bramlett, Inc., Defendants. APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29598 - 2007-07-09
. and W. T. Bramlett, Inc., Defendants. APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29598 - 2007-07-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that this ambiguity “exacerbated” “[t]he weakness of this seizure.” See Meye, No. 2010AP336-CR, ¶9. ¶20 In Leon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111914 - 2017-09-21
that this ambiguity “exacerbated” “[t]he weakness of this seizure.” See Meye, No. 2010AP336-CR, ¶9. ¶20 In Leon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111914 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from testifying regarding causation, the circuit court explained: [T]he record’s pretty clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79150 - 2014-09-15
from testifying regarding causation, the circuit court explained: [T]he record’s pretty clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79150 - 2014-09-15
State v. Armando P. Rodriguez
was submitted on the briefs of Donald T. Lang, assistant state public defender. Respondent ATTORNEYS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13178 - 2005-03-31
was submitted on the briefs of Donald T. Lang, assistant state public defender. Respondent ATTORNEYS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13178 - 2005-03-31
Clayton Ganser v. Claudia Schwartz
of the option: [I]t is not enough that the promise induces the conduct of the promisee or that the conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12757 - 2005-03-31
of the option: [I]t is not enough that the promise induces the conduct of the promisee or that the conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12757 - 2005-03-31