Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31951 - 31960 of 91586 for 1.
Search results 31951 - 31960 of 91586 for 1.
COURT OF APPEALS
: jeffrey a. wagner, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Fine and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30338 - 2007-09-24
: jeffrey a. wagner, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Fine and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30338 - 2007-09-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Vergeront, Higginbotham and Sherman, JJ. No. 2011AP515 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Thomas Stanton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84440 - 2014-09-15
Vergeront, Higginbotham and Sherman, JJ. No. 2011AP515 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Thomas Stanton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84440 - 2014-09-15
State v. Timothy A. Knight
. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J. Timothy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15411 - 2005-03-31
. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J. Timothy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15411 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carl J. Knapp
.2d 1, 8, 434 N.W.2d 609, 611 (1989). A new factor is a fact highly relevant to the imposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9262 - 2005-03-31
.2d 1, 8, 434 N.W.2d 609, 611 (1989). A new factor is a fact highly relevant to the imposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9262 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(2019-20).1 For the reasons that follow, we affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522789 - 2022-05-19
(2019-20).1 For the reasons that follow, we affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522789 - 2022-05-19
CA Blank Order
. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2011-12).[1] Counsel provided Hiroskey
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99903 - 2013-07-22
. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2011-12).[1] Counsel provided Hiroskey
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99903 - 2013-07-22
CA Blank Order
for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] The appeal is summarily dismissed. In 1984
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107662 - 2014-01-29
for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] The appeal is summarily dismissed. In 1984
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107662 - 2014-01-29
State v. LaPonzo Monroe Dallas
, P.J., Fine and Curley, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. LaPonzo Dallas appeals from the order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19523 - 2005-09-06
, P.J., Fine and Curley, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. LaPonzo Dallas appeals from the order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19523 - 2005-09-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is appropriate for summary disposition and we summarily affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102074 - 2017-09-21
is appropriate for summary disposition and we summarily affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102074 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
, JJ. No. 2008AP116 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Clair Ellsworth Visgar appeals an order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34117 - 2014-09-15
, JJ. No. 2008AP116 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Clair Ellsworth Visgar appeals an order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34117 - 2014-09-15