Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31951 - 31960 of 91617 for 1.

State v. Carl J. Knapp
.2d 1, 8, 434 N.W.2d 609, 611 (1989). A new factor is a fact highly relevant to the imposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9262 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] The appeal is summarily dismissed. In 1984
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107662 - 2014-01-29

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.32 (2021-22)1 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Lipp was sent a copy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708001 - 2023-09-27

[PDF] WI 67
Bar's bylaws.1 The bylaw changes were duly filed with the clerk of supreme court pursuant to Supreme
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242157 - 2019-06-12

[PDF] State v. Sharon McBride
. WEDEMEYER, P.J.1 Sharon McBride appeals from a judgment entered after a jury found her guilty of battery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9102 - 2017-09-19

State v. Shawn D. Knapp
and not on membership alone, we affirm. Knapp pled no contest to five burglary charges.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7755 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Hoover, P.J., Mangerson and Stark, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Mary Falstad appeals her judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113460 - 2014-06-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Blanchard, P.J., Lundsten and Sherman, JJ. Nos. 2013AP2020 2013AP2021 2 ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124922 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
: Daniel R. Moeser, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J., Vergeront and Bridge, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44494 - 2009-12-09

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Jack Rieder Electronic Notice Kurt A. Crossman 807 Perkins Ave., Apt. 1 Waukesha, WI 53186
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=761414 - 2024-02-14