Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31951 - 31960 of 52813 for address.
Search results 31951 - 31960 of 52813 for address.
COURT OF APPEALS
that Rypma did not explicitly address the makeup of the comparison groups used for the Static-99R in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105570 - 2013-12-11
that Rypma did not explicitly address the makeup of the comparison groups used for the Static-99R in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105570 - 2013-12-11
CA Blank Order
next address Gearhart’s challenge to a jury instruction. Because there is no standard jury instruction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113106 - 2014-05-22
next address Gearhart’s challenge to a jury instruction. Because there is no standard jury instruction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113106 - 2014-05-22
CA Blank Order
, we will address McCoy’s assertion, made in a footnote in his brief, that pursuing a postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103700 - 2013-11-06
, we will address McCoy’s assertion, made in a footnote in his brief, that pursuing a postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103700 - 2013-11-06
State v. Juanita K. Von Ruden
-person jury. We do not address whether § 756.096(3)(am), Stats., also violates art. I, § 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13145 - 2005-03-31
-person jury. We do not address whether § 756.096(3)(am), Stats., also violates art. I, § 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13145 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lori J. Schroeder
is that the trial court made extensive remarks addressing the second factor. The jury was there for that case alone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15380 - 2005-03-31
is that the trial court made extensive remarks addressing the second factor. The jury was there for that case alone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15380 - 2005-03-31
State v. Warren J. Pik
court did not address Pik's medical condition. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8992 - 2005-03-31
court did not address Pik's medical condition. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8992 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by two years of extended supervision. Appellate counsel addresses two issues in the no-merit reports
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=614254 - 2023-01-24
by two years of extended supervision. Appellate counsel addresses two issues in the no-merit reports
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=614254 - 2023-01-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
See RULE 809.21. The no-merit report addresses the following appellate issues: (1) whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102773 - 2017-09-21
See RULE 809.21. The no-merit report addresses the following appellate issues: (1) whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102773 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, failed to gather materials to submit to the sentencing court on his behalf, and failed to address
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=452742 - 2021-11-16
, failed to gather materials to submit to the sentencing court on his behalf, and failed to address
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=452742 - 2021-11-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentences. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report addresses potential issues of whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916182 - 2025-02-19
sentences. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report addresses potential issues of whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916182 - 2025-02-19