Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 31951 - 31960 of 50548 for our.
Search results 31951 - 31960 of 50548 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
relief and reconsideration. He seeks to withdraw his no contest plea. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192045 - 2017-09-21
relief and reconsideration. He seeks to withdraw his no contest plea. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192045 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173355 - 2017-09-21
. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173355 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
constitutional rights. There would be no arguable merit to this claim. Our review of the record discloses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=539085 - 2022-07-06
constitutional rights. There would be no arguable merit to this claim. Our review of the record discloses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=539085 - 2022-07-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his petitions for sentence adjustment and positive adjustment time. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187331 - 2017-09-21
his petitions for sentence adjustment and positive adjustment time. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187331 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey H. Andrus
. That she did not do. Our conclusion that the State breached the plea agreement does not resolve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9189 - 2017-09-19
. That she did not do. Our conclusion that the State breached the plea agreement does not resolve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9189 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the same opinions at trial. We agree with the circuit court’s assessment. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162924 - 2017-09-21
the same opinions at trial. We agree with the circuit court’s assessment. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162924 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Our independent review of the record reveals no arguable basis for reversing the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=459758 - 2021-12-07
. Our independent review of the record reveals no arguable basis for reversing the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=459758 - 2021-12-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
a reasonable possibility that a jury might award less than $350,000, if the matter went to trial. ¶9 Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34264 - 2014-09-15
a reasonable possibility that a jury might award less than $350,000, if the matter went to trial. ¶9 Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34264 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
factor warranted sentence modification. The circuit court rejected both challenges. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190154 - 2017-09-21
factor warranted sentence modification. The circuit court rejected both challenges. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190154 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclusion that there would be no arguable merit to a challenge of Yancey’s sentences. Our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961948 - 2025-05-28
conclusion that there would be no arguable merit to a challenge of Yancey’s sentences. Our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961948 - 2025-05-28